» Articles » PMID: 33717503

Non-contrast and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer Hepatic Metastases: Comparison of Tumor Measurements and Impact on Response Assessment

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Mar 15
PMID 33717503
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For many common malignancies, including breast cancer, evaluation for metastatic disease using multiphase computed tomography (CT) has fallen out of favor and been replaced by studies performed only in the portal venous phase. However, differences in tumor vascularity could produce differences in appearance on post-contrast imaging.

Purpose: To assess non-contrast phase and portal venous phase computed tomography in detection and measurement of hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma.

Materials And Methods: A total of 75 CT scans from 52 breast cancer patients were independently assessed by three body imagers for lesion presence, number and size. Readers randomly assessed portal venous phase or combined phase images at one session with cross-over reads performed four to six weeks later.

Results: In the 58% of cases where index lesions measured larger on combined phase, the mean difference in lesion size was 5.7 mm. In this group, combined phase reads demonstrated an 8.4 mm increase in sum of largest diameters, and a mean percentage sum of largest diameters increase of 19% compared to portal venous phase-only reads.

Conclusion: Addition of non-contrast phase images results in increased index lesion size in most patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer. If only the portal venous phase is utilized, there is potential for incorrectly diagnosing disease progression on follow-up due to underestimation of lesion size.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of virtual monochromatic imaging with dual-energy computed tomography of small liver metastases from malignant abdominal tumours: Quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Okada H, Matsunaga N, Yamamoto T, Yamauchi M, Suzuki K Acta Radiol Open. 2023; 12(12):20584601231220324.

PMID: 38075408 PMC: 10702407. DOI: 10.1177/20584601231220324.

References
1.
Sadigh G, Applegate K, Baumgarten D . Comparative accuracy of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT versus noncontrast CT plus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterization of patients with hypervascular liver metastases: a critically appraised topic. Acad Radiol. 2013; 21(1):113-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.023. View

2.
Daudt A, Alberg A, Helzlsouer K . Epidemiology, prevention, and early detection of breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 1996; 8(6):455-61. DOI: 10.1097/00001622-199611000-00003. View

3.
Nazarian L, Park J, Halpern E, Parker L, Johnson P, Wechsler R . Size of colorectal liver metastases at abdominal CT: comparison of precontrast and postcontrast studies. Radiology. 1999; 213(3):825-30. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc29825. View

4.
Sheafor D, Frederick M, Paulson E, Keogan M, Delong D, Nelson R . Comparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous-dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(4):961-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587129. View

5.
Park J, Nazarian L, Halpern E, Feld R, Parker L, Wechsler R . Comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for assessing interval change in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Acad Radiol. 2001; 8(8):698-704. DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80576-7. View