» Articles » PMID: 33716697

Modulatory Effects of Prediction Accuracy on Electroencephalographic Brain Activity During Prediction

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Mar 15
PMID 33716697
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prediction is essential for the efficiency of many cognitive processes; however, this process is not always perfect. Predictive coding theory suggests that the brain generates and updates a prediction to respond to an upcoming event. Although an electrophysiological index of prediction, the stimulus preceding negativity (SPN), has been reported, it remains unknown whether the SPN reflects the prediction accuracy, or whether it is associated with the prediction error, which corresponds to a mismatch between a prediction and an actual input. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate this question using electroencephalography (EEG). Participants were asked to predict the original pictures from pictures that had undergone different levels of pixelation. The SPN amplitude was affected by the level of pixelation and correlated with the subjective evaluation of the prediction accuracy. Furthermore, late positive components (LPC) were negatively correlated with SPN. These results suggest that the amplitude of SPN reflects the prediction accuracy; more accurate prediction increases the SPN and reduces the prediction error, resulting in reduced LPC amplitudes.

Citing Articles

Predictive brain activity related to auditory information is associated with performance in speech comprehension tasks in noisy environments.

Okamoto K, Hoyano K, Saiki Y, Nomura T, Irie K, Obama N Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1479810.

PMID: 39539352 PMC: 11557536. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1479810.


Exploring the neural underpinnings of chord prediction uncertainty: an electroencephalography (EEG) study.

Ono K, Mizuochi R, Yamamoto K, Sasaoka T, Ymawaki S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4586.

PMID: 38403782 PMC: 10894873. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55366-1.

References
1.
Johnen A, Harrison N . Level of uncertainty about the affective nature of a pictorial stimulus influences anticipatory neural processes: An event-related potential (ERP) study. Neuropsychologia. 2020; 146:107525. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107525. View

2.
Yang J, Ouyang F, Holm L, Huang Y, Gan L, Zhou L . A mechanism of timing variability underlying the association between the mean and SD of asynchrony. Hum Mov Sci. 2019; 67:102500. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102500. View

3.
Olofsson J, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J . Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol. 2008; 77(3):247-65. PMC: 2443061. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006. View

4.
Ivanov I, Liu X, Clerkin S, Schulz K, Friston K, Newcorn J . Effects of motivation on reward and attentional networks: an fMRI study. Brain Behav. 2012; 2(6):741-53. PMC: 3500461. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.80. View

5.
Okubo M, Suzuki H, Nicholls M . [A Japanese version of the FLANDERS handedness questionnaire]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2015; 85(5):474-81. DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13235. View