» Articles » PMID: 33716497

The Danger of Denialism: Lessons from the Brazilian Pandemic

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 15
PMID 33716497
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Scientific denialism has always had harmful consequences for humanity, but with the advent of the pandemic these effects seem to have been accentuated.

Main Body: Unwillingness to accept the facts about the COVID-19 pandemic ascertained by scientists and public health authorities has led to widespread scientific denialism, including the emergence of conspiracy theories of all sorts. Examples are diverse, reaching both developed and developing countries, arriving through populist leaders and the spread of conspiracy theories through social media.

Short Conclusion: It is important to pay attention to the risk of the extremes of this denialism and the possible repercussions, especially in countries that have leaders who agree with these conceptions, such as Brazil and the USA.

Citing Articles

A plausible hypothesis for the higher Covid-19 mortality in Brazil.

Silva H Afr Health Sci. 2024; 23(4):48-50.

PMID: 38974310 PMC: 11225491. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.8.


[Online survey on the reasons for vaccine hesitancy against COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Brazil].

Salvador P, Alves K, Carvalho K, Nehab M, Camacho K, Reis A Cad Saude Publica. 2023; 39(10):e00159122.

PMID: 37851730 PMC: 10581683. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT159122.


Assessing COVID-19 pandemic excess deaths in Brazil: Years 2020 and 2021.

Colonia S, Cardeal L, de Oliveira R, Trinca L PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0272752.

PMID: 37228083 PMC: 10212149. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272752.


Ethical principles for infodemiology and infoveillance studies concerning infodemic management on social media.

Lotto M, Hanjahanja-Phiri T, Padalko H, Oetomo A, Butt Z, Boger J Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1130079.

PMID: 37033062 PMC: 10076562. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130079.


COVID-19 in a Pre-Omicron Era: A Cross-Sectional Immuno-Epidemical and Genomic Evaluation.

Pagnossa J, de Oliveira Rodrigues S, Oliveira G, Adnan M, Aljaid M, Assis I Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36851150 PMC: 9960145. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020272.


References
1.
Allen G . Essays on science and society. Is a new eugenics afoot?. Science. 2001; 294(5540):59-61. DOI: 10.1126/science.1066325. View

2.
Mckee M, Diethelm P . How the growth of denialism undermines public health. BMJ. 2010; 341:c6950. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6950. View

3.
Silva Professor H . The historic success of vaccination and the global challenge posed by inaccurate knowledge in social networks. Patient Educ Couns. 2020; 104(1):213-214. PMC: 7487075. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.006. View

4.
Ioannidis J . Scientific petitions and open letters in the era of covid-19. BMJ. 2020; 371:m4048. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4048. View