» Articles » PMID: 33712877

Regional and Gender-specific Analyses Give New Perspectives for Secular Trend in Hip Fracture Incidence

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2021 Mar 13
PMID 33712877
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have reported secular trends in hip fracture incidence, but knowledge about the possible causes is limited. We studied potential explanations by examining spatio-temporal epidemiology of the fractures and estimating relative risks between genders.

Methods: This observational study was based on all inpatient hospital discharges in 1972-2018 in Finland. We divided the data by gender, 5-year age groups and Finnish sub-regions and estimated gender and age standardized spatio-temporal rates of hip fractures by using a Bayesian age-period-cohort model.

Results: In 1972, women's hip fracture incidence was 1.2-1.3 times higher in western and coastal Finland compared to eastern and inland areas. Also, women had approximately 1.7 times higher average risk to get a hip fracture compared to men. Today, the hip fracture differences between the areas have converged to insignificant and the relative risk between genders has diminished to 1.2. Age-specific relative risks indicate greater hip fracture risk for younger men and older women, and the women's risk increases beyond the risk of men at age 65 which is ten years later than in the beginning of the study period.

Conclusion: Incidence of hip fracture has converged significantly between regions and genders. Especially factors related with socioeconomic development and increased frailty and longevity seem to be important. The hip fracture incidence rate ratio between women and men has systematically decreased in time, and more attention should be paid to hip fracture risk in men in the future.

Citing Articles

Predictive Feasibility of the Graz Malnutrition Screening, Controlling Nutritional Status Score, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, and Prognostic Nutritional Index for Postoperative Long-Term Mortality After Surgically Treated Proximal Femur Fracture.

Popp D, Stich-Regner M, Schmoelz L, Silvaieh S, Heisinger S, Nia A Nutrients. 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39770903 PMC: 11676286. DOI: 10.3390/nu16244280.


Safety of In-hospital Parenteral Antiosteoporosis Therapy Following a Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort.

Abu-Jwead A, Fisher D, Goldabart A, Yoel U, Press Y, Tsur A J Endocr Soc. 2024; 8(11):bvae172.

PMID: 39416429 PMC: 11481011. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae172.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal femoral nail versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Kutlu G, Akbulut Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):507.

PMID: 39192359 PMC: 11348573. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04941-3.


Combining Register and Radiological Visits Data Allows to Reliably Identify Incident Wrist Fractures.

Nissinen T, Sund R, Suoranta S, Kroger H, Vaananen S Clin Epidemiol. 2023; 15:1001-1008.

PMID: 37750092 PMC: 10518171. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S421013.


Predictors of and predictive nomogram for cut-out of proximal femur nail anti-rotation device in intertrochanteric fractures.

Fang Q, Han J, Liu W, Wang D, Ge Z, Wang G Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(7):3985-3995.

PMID: 36348087 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04676-y.


References
1.
Johnell O, Kanis J . An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17(12):1726-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. View

2.
Kanis J, Oden A, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Wahl D, Cooper C . A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23(9):2239-56. PMC: 3421108. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3. View

3.
Cauley J, Chalhoub D, Kassem A, Fuleihan G . Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014; 10(6):338-51. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.51. View

4.
Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievanen H . Continuously declining incidence of hip fracture in Finland: Analysis of nationwide database in 1970-2016. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018; 77:64-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.008. View

5.
Barbier S, Ecochard R, Schott A, Colin C, Delmas P, Jaglal S . Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 20(3):371-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0687-y. View