» Articles » PMID: 33712507

Novel Antimuscarinic Antidepressant-like Compounds with Reduced Effects on Cognition

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Mar 13
PMID 33712507
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cholinergic nervous system has been implicated in mood disorders, evident in the fast-onset antidepressant effects of scopolamine, a potent muscarinic antagonist, in clinical studies. One prominent disadvantage of the use of scopolamine in the treatment of depression is its detrimental effects on cognition, especially as such effects might aggravate cognitive deficits that occur with depression itself. Thus, the identification of antimuscarinic drugs that are free of such detrimental effects may provide an important avenue for the development of novel therapeutics for the management of depression. The present data in rats indicate that a historical muscarinic antagonist, L-687,306, and a muscarinic antagonist of our own design, CJ2100, were as or more effective than scopolamine in antagonizing both the bradycardic effects of the muscarinic agonist arecoline in cardiovascular studies and its discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects in behavioral studies. Additionally, both novel muscarinic antagonists were as effective as scopolamine in decreasing immobility in the forced swim test, a preclinical indicator of potential antidepressant activity. However, at equieffective or even larger doses, they were considerably less disruptive than scopolamine in assays of cognition-related behavior. All three drugs displayed high specificity for the mAChRs with few off-target binding sites, and CJ2100 showed modest affinity across the mAChRs when compared with L-687,306 and scopolamine. These data emphasize the dissimilar pharmacological profiles that are evident across antimuscarinic compounds and the potential utility of novel antagonists for the improved treatment of depression. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Some clinical studies with the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine document its ability to produce antidepressant effects in patients with mood disorders; however, scopolamine also has well known adverse effects on both autonomic and centrally mediated physiological functions that limit its therapeutic use. This study characterizes the cardiovascular and discriminative stimulus effects of two novel muscarinic antagonists, L-687,306 and CJ2100, that produce antidepressant-like effects in a rodent model (forced swim test) without affecting touchscreen-based cognitive performance (titrating psychomotor vigilance and delayed matching-to-position).

Citing Articles

Chronic ecologically relevant stress effects on reverse-translated touchscreen assays of reward responsivity and attentional processes in male rats: Implications for depression.

Gonzalez P, Jenkins A, LaMalfa K, Kangas B J Neurochem. 2024; 168(9):2190-2200.

PMID: 38922872 PMC: 11449663. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.16157.


A Little "Re-Cognition" Goes a Long Way for Pro-Cognitive Therapeutics in Alcohol Studies.

Salling M, Pleil K J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2024; 389(3):254-257.

PMID: 38772715 PMC: 11776431. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.123.002058.


Open science and data sharing in cognitive neuroscience with MouseBytes and MouseBytes.

Memar S, Jiang E, Prado V, Saksida L, Bussey T, Prado M Sci Data. 2023; 10(1):210.

PMID: 37059739 PMC: 10104860. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02106-1.


Drug Design Targeting the Muscarinic Receptors and the Implications in Central Nervous System Disorders.

Johnson C, Kangas B, Jutkiewicz E, Bergman J, Coop A Biomedicines. 2022; 10(2).

PMID: 35203607 PMC: 8962391. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020398.


Nicotinic aspects of the discriminative stimulus effects of arecoline.

Winger G Behav Pharmacol. 2021; 32(7):581-589.

PMID: 34417356 PMC: 8446330. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000652.

References
1.
Frampton J . Vortioxetine: A Review in Cognitive Dysfunction in Depression. Drugs. 2016; 76(17):1675-1682. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-016-0655-3. View

2.
Deutsch J . The cholinergic synapse and the site of memory. Science. 1971; 174(4011):788-94. DOI: 10.1126/science.174.4011.788. View

3.
Porter R, Gallagher P, Thompson J, Young A . Neurocognitive impairment in drug-free patients with major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2003; 182:214-20. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.182.3.214. View

4.
Witkin J, Gordon R, Chiang P . Comparison of in vitro actions with behavioral effects of antimuscarinic agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987; 242(3):796-803. View

5.
Weed M, GOLD L . The effects of dopaminergic agents on reaction time in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998; 137(1):33-42. DOI: 10.1007/s002130050590. View