» Articles » PMID: 33711173

Revisions of Clinical Protocols Using the Plan Do Check Act Cycle Improved Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants at 2 years

Overview
Journal Acta Paediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2021 Mar 12
PMID 33711173
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Clinical quality improvement is often cumbersome due to established protocols. We aimed to investigate whether outcomes of preterm infants improve with protocol revisions using iteration cycles.

Methods: Preterm infants born <28 weeks gestation between January 2006 and December 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Protocols were revised using Plan Do Check Act cycle. Death and serious adverse events at term were reviewed in six-monthly quality improvement meetings. Adverse outcome of death or motor/sensory impairments at two years was compared before and after two major protocol changes, which were implemented in January 2008 and January 2012.

Results: Based on the appraisal for period 2006-2007, strategies for surfactant, narcotics, parenteral nutrition, respiratory gas humidity and prophylactic indomethacin and antibiotics were changed for period 2008-2011. For period 2012-2015, stabilisation of infants was accelerated via very early catheterisation. Of 162 infants (84 males, 25.5 ± 1.5 weeks gestation) within the whole cohort, 63 developed adverse outcomes, which were fewer for periods 2008-2011 (p = 0.013) and 2012-2015 (p = 0.035) compared with period 2006-2007 (adjusted for gestational age, Apgar scores and sex).

Conclusion: Careful bottom-up revisions of protocols using iteration cycles, accounting for local settings, successfully improved the outcomes of preterm infants.

References
1.
Zeitlin J, Manktelow B, Piedvache A, Cuttini M, Boyle E, van Heijst A . Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort. BMJ. 2016; 354:i2976. PMC: 4933797. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2976. View

2.
Lebeda F, Scheerer J, Dembek Z . A Systems Perspective of DoD Global Health Engagement. Mil Med. 2020; 185(7-8):e1024-e1031. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz461. View

3.
Kusuda S, Fujimura M, Sakuma I, Aotani H, Kabe K, Itani Y . Morbidity and mortality of infants with very low birth weight in Japan: center variation. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(4):e1130-8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2724. View

4.
Itabashi K, Horiuchi T, Kusuda S, Kabe K, Itani Y, Nakamura T . Mortality rates for extremely low birth weight infants born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(2):445-50. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-0763. View

5.
Moyses H, Johnson M, Leaf A, Cornelius V . Early parenteral nutrition and growth outcomes in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 97(4):816-26. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.042028. View