» Articles » PMID: 33710440

[Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis : How Much, How Long and How to Spare?]

Overview
Journal Z Rheumatol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2021 Mar 12
PMID 33710440
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with high-dose glucocorticoids (GC) regularly leads to a control of the inflammatory activity, so that high-dose GC is still the recommended standard treatment in the current guidelines; however, after discontinuation of GC treatment or reduction of the GC dosage, relapses occur in up to 70% of patients in the further course of the disease, making it necessary to resume treatment or increase the dosage. As a consequence many patients therefore have to be treated with GC often in high doses over several years, which results in a high cumulative exposure to GC. The risk for GC-associated diseases, such as diabetes, glaucoma, osteoporosis or severe infections is therefore significantly increased for patients with giant cell arteritis. For patients with GC-associated comorbidities or increased risk of developing them or patients with a relapse, the current guidelines therefore recommend GC-sparing treatment with tocilizumab or alternatively methotrexate. It is currently unclear over what period of time patients should be treated with GC and GC-sparing treatment, since high-quality study data on de-escalation strategies for GCA are currently still lacking. Decisions on treatment duration and intensity must therefore be made individually for each patient, taking into account general and patient-specific risk factors for a GC-dependent course, GCA-associated vascular damage (stenoses, aneurysms, visual loss) and treatment-associated complications.

Citing Articles

The estimated prevalence of osteoporosis in Bahrain: a multi-centered-based study.

Hassan A, Tayem Y, Sadat-Ali M, Almarabheh A, Alawadhi A, Butt A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):9.

PMID: 38167308 PMC: 10759480. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07145-8.

References
1.
Agueda A, Monti S, Luqmani R, Buttgereit F, Cid M, Dasgupta B . Management of Takayasu arteritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendation for the management of large vessel vasculitis. RMD Open. 2019; 5(2):e001020. PMC: 6803017. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001020. View

2.
Alba M, Garcia-Martinez A, Prieto-Gonzalez S, Tavera-Bahillo I, Corbera-Bellalta M, Planas-Rigol E . Relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis: prevalence, characteristics, and associated clinical findings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 106 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014; 93(5):194-201. PMC: 4602452. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000033. View

3.
Alsolaimani R, Bhavsar S, Khalidi N, Pagnoux C, Mandzia J, Tay K . Severe Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 5 Cases and Literature Review. J Rheumatol. 2016; 43(3):648-56. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150143. View

4.
Berger C, Daikeler T . Longitudinal versus cross-sectional IL-6 measurements in tocilizumab-treated GCA. Response to: 'Analysis of IL-6 measurement in GCA patients treated with tocilizumab should consider concomitant treatment with prednisone' by Samson and Bonnotte. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 79(8):e103. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215729. View

5.
Breuer G, Poltorak V, Nesher G . Survival of patients with giant cell arteritis: a controversial issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020; 38 Suppl 124(2):210-213. View