» Articles » PMID: 33709073

Probabilistic Outlier Identification for RNA Sequencing Generalized Linear Models

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Mar 12
PMID 33709073
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Relative transcript abundance has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the function of genes in biological systems. For the differential analysis of transcript abundance using RNA sequencing data, the negative binomial model is by far the most frequently adopted. However, common methods that are based on a negative binomial model are not robust to extreme outliers, which we found to be abundant in public datasets. So far, no rigorous and probabilistic methods for detection of outliers have been developed for RNA sequencing data, leaving the identification mostly to visual inspection. Recent advances in Bayesian computation allow large-scale comparison of observed data against its theoretical distribution given in a statistical model. Here we propose ppcseq, a key quality-control tool for identifying transcripts that include outlier data points in differential expression analysis, which do not follow a negative binomial distribution. Applying ppcseq to analyse several publicly available datasets using popular tools, we show that from 3 to 10 percent of differentially abundant transcripts across algorithms and datasets had statistics inflated by the presence of outliers.

Citing Articles

cellsig plug-in enhances CIBERSORTx signature selection for multidataset transcriptomes with sparse multilevel modelling.

Khan M, Wu J, Sun Y, Barrow A, Papenfuss A, Mangiola S Bioinformatics. 2023; 39(12).

PMID: 37952182 PMC: 10692870. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad685.


sccomp: Robust differential composition and variability analysis for single-cell data.

Mangiola S, Roth-Schulze A, Trussart M, Zozaya-Valdes E, Ma M, Gao Z Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(33):e2203828120.

PMID: 37549298 PMC: 10438834. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2203828120.


Taurine deficiency as a driver of aging.

Singh P, Gollapalli K, Mangiola S, Schranner D, Yusuf M, Chamoli M Science. 2023; 380(6649):eabn9257.

PMID: 37289866 PMC: 10630957. DOI: 10.1126/science.abn9257.


Gene filtering strategies for machine learning guided biomarker discovery using neonatal sepsis RNA-seq data.

Parkinson E, Liberatore F, Watkins W, Andrews R, Edkins S, Hibbert J Front Genet. 2023; 14:1158352.

PMID: 37113992 PMC: 10126415. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1158352.

References
1.
Liu R, Holik A, Su S, Jansz N, Chen K, Leong H . Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(15):e97. PMC: 4551905. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv412. View

2.
Blein T, Balzergue C, Roule T, Gabriel M, Scalisi L, Francois T . Landscape of the Noncoding Transcriptome Response of Two Arabidopsis Ecotypes to Phosphate Starvation. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183(3):1058-1072. PMC: 7333710. DOI: 10.1104/pp.20.00446. View

3.
Ren X, Kuan P . Negative binomial additive model for RNA-Seq data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020; 21(1):171. PMC: 7195715. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-3506-x. View

4.
McCarthy D, Chen Y, Smyth G . Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(10):4288-97. PMC: 3378882. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks042. View

5.
Varet H, Brillet-Gueguen L, Coppee J, Dillies M . SARTools: A DESeq2- and EdgeR-Based R Pipeline for Comprehensive Differential Analysis of RNA-Seq Data. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0157022. PMC: 4900645. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157022. View