Clinico-Radiological Outcome of Single-Level and Hybrid Total Disc Replacement with Spineart Baguera®-C for Cervical Myeloradiculopathy: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study in Indian Population

Overview

Journal Asian J Neurosurg

Specialty Neurology

Date 2021 Mar 12

PMID 33708654

Citations 2

Authors

Jeevan Kumar Sharma

Tarush Rustagi

Nandan Marathe

Abhinandan Reddy Mallepally

Rajat Mahajan

Harvinder Singh Chhabra

Kalidutta Das

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: Cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy is one of the most frequent ailments encountered by spine surgeon. Motion-preserving surgeries in cervical spine is a standard of care due to its certain advantages such as biomechanical anatomical conformity, reduced chances of adjacent segment degeneration, and revision surgeries. While there is abundant data from some centers, data from developing countries are still limited.

Aims: The aim was to study the clinico-radiological outcome of single-level and hybrid total disc replacement (TDR) with Spineart Baguera-C cervical prosthesis for cervical myeloradiculopathy.

Settings And Design: Retrospective study.

Materials And Methods: Retrospective analysis of the 29 consecutive patient undergoing single level TDR and hybrid fixation (i.e., TDR with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) with Spineart Baguera-C cervical prosthesis for myeloradiculopathy from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017, was done. Radiological features and outcome were studied from data collected on Insta-picture archiving and communication system.

Statistical Analysis Used: SAS 9.4 was used for all computations. Results on continuous measurements were presented as mean and standard deviation (min-max) and results on categorical measurements were presented as numbers (n) and percentages.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study. The mean age was 43.31 ± 9.04 years with 14 males and 15 females. The most common level of TDR was C5-C6 (72.41%). The mean follow-up duration was 3.14 years ± 1.13 years (2-5 years). The mean hospital stay was 4.93 ± 2.12 days. The mean neck disability index (NDI) at admission was 27.24 ± 7.66 which decreased to 6.41 ± 4.29 at final follow-up.

Conclusions: Two-year data on treatment with Spineart Baguera-C cervical prosthesis shows significantly improved NDI, visual analog scale (arm) with maintenance of movement of the prosthesis.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the long-term efficacy of ROI-C and conventional cage-plate in treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study.

Lu H, Wang C, Li R, Fang M, Qian J, Qian B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):848.

PMID: 39448926 PMC: 11515413. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07985-y.

Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Hybrid Total Disc Replacement for Bilevel Pathology with Cervical Radiculopathy/Myelopathy: A Comparative Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up in an Indian Population.

Sharma J, Varma K, Reddy Mallepally A, Marathe N, Rustagi T, Mohapatra B Asian Spine J. 2021; 16(4):493-501.

PMID: 34784703 PMC: 9441440. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2021.0209.

References

Gao F, Mao T, Sun W, Guo W, Wang Y, Li Z . An Updated Meta-Analysis Comparing Artificial Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(23):1816-23. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001138. View

Zhu X, Chen L, Lin J . Selective COX-2 inhibitor versus non-selective COX-2 inhibitor for the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(31):e11649. PMC: 6081155. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011649. View

Wu J, Huang W, Tsai H, Ko C, Fay L, Tu T . Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 16(6):594-600. DOI: 10.3171/2012.2.SPINE111066. View

Lofgren H, Engquist M, Hoffmann P, Sigstedt B, Vavruch L . Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009; 19(3):464-73. PMC: 2899760. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1161-z. View

Mummaneni P, Kenneth Burkus J, Haid R, Traynelis V, Zdeblick T . Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 6(3):198-209. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198. View

Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W, Marzluff J, Highsmith J, Mugglin A . Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(26):2227-39. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000031. View

Murtagh R, Castellvi A . Motion preservation surgery in the spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014; 24(2):287-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2014.01.008. View

Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y . Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 35(1):36-43. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d. View

Sasso W, Smucker J, Sasso M, Sasso R . Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017; 42(4):209-216. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001746. View

10.

CLOWARD R . The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958; 15(6):602-17. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602. View

11.

FERNSTROM U . Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1966; 357:154-9. View

12.

Zhou H, Qu Y, Dong R, Kang M, Zhao J . Does heterotopic ossification affect the outcomes of cervical total disc replacement? A meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(6):E332-40. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000776. View

13.

Hu Y, Lv G, Ren S, Johansen D . Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0149312. PMC: 4752293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149312. View

14.

Xu B, Ma J, Tian J, Ge L, Ma X . Indirect meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes of total cervical disc replacements with fusions for cervical degenerative disc disease. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1740. PMC: 5431800. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01865-3. View

15.

Turel M, Kerolus M, Adogwa O, Traynelis V . Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say?. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 42(2):E2. DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16414. View

16.

Lavelle W, Riew K, Levi A, Florman J . Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 44(9):601-608. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002907. View

17.

Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J . Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(24):2802-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5. View

18.

Yi S, Kim K, Yang M, Yang J, Kim H, Ha Y . Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(16):1556-61. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6526b. View

19.

Heller J, Sasso R, Papadopoulos S, Anderson P, Fessler R, Hacker R . Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 34(2):101-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263. View

20.

Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B . Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic.... Spine J. 2008; 9(4):275-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006. View