» Articles » PMID: 33708478

Diagnostic Efficiency of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve with CZT Dynamic SPECT Imaging for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: a Comparative Study with Traditional Semi-quantitative Evaluation

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 12
PMID 33708478
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantitation with cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is being increasingly investigated toward clinical utilization.

Methods: In this prospective study, forty-nine patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent a rest/adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stress dynamic and routine gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by CZT SPECT and then received coronary angiography (CAG). Quantitative diagnosis from the dynamic SPECT and a flow diagram was automatically obtained by the dedicated software and compared with the result of semi-quantitative analysis with gated MPI using the angiographic stenosis as the reference standard.

Results: When stenosis ≥50% was considered at the participant level, the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (AC) of the quantitative diagnosis were higher than semi-quantitative method as (84.4% 65.6%, 88.2% 70.6%, 93.1% 80.8%, 75.0% 52.2%, 85.7% 67.3%) (all P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis generated the optimal critical value as 1.86 and 1.61 mL/min/g for stress MBF (sMBF) and MFR, respectively. The diagnosis performance of the quantitative diagnosis was higher than semi-quantitative method as (78.9% 68.4%, 63.3% 60.0%, 57.7% 52.0%, 82.6% 75.0%, 69.4% 63.3%) for the criteria of ≥75% stenosis on CAG (all P<0.05) with optimal critical values as 1.71 and 1.15 mL/min/g. There was no significant difference between sMBF and MFR.

Conclusions: The diagnostic efficiency by using the quantitative method of CZT dynamic SPECT imaging is superior to traditional semi-quantitative gated MPI for the diagnosis of CAD, which improved the diagnostic specificity and accuracy when the critical was stenosis ≥50%.

Citing Articles

Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: CZT SPECT Study.

Zavadovsky K, Vorobyeva D, Mochula O, Mochula A, Maltseva A, Bayev A Front Nucl Med. 2024; 2:935539.

PMID: 39354978 PMC: 11440855. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2022.935539.


Assessing the diagnostic value of left ventricular synchrony indices derived from phase analysis by D-SPECT in identifying obstructive coronary artery disease.

Ding X, Cui L, Li J, Cao J, Ding M, Wang H Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 40(9):1919-1930.

PMID: 38960945 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03182-z.


Coronary microvascular dysfunction and myocardial area at risk assessed by cadmium zinc telluride single photon emission computed tomography after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Cui L, Wang Y, Chen W, Huang P, Tang Z, Wang J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(6):3816-3827.

PMID: 38846287 PMC: 11151247. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1260.


The Influence of Kinetic Models and Attenuation Correction on Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (CZT SPECT)-Derived Myocardial Blood Flow and Reserve: Correlation with Invasive Angiography Data.

Mochula A, Maltseva A, Kopeva K, Grakova E, Mochula O, Zavadovsky K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592092 PMC: 10932033. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051271.


Exploring coronary microvascular function by quantitative CZT-SPECT: a small step or giant leap for INOCA patients?.

DAntonio A, Mannarino T Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(13):3806-3808.

PMID: 37535108 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06358-2.


References
1.
Ito S, Endo A, Okada T, Nakamura T, Sugamori T, Takahashi N . Comparison of CTAC and prone imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease using CZT SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2017; 31(8):629-635. PMC: 5622918. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-017-1194-z. View

2.
Berman D, Kang X, Slomka P, Gerlach J, De Yang L, Hayes S . Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007; 14(4):521-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.05.008. View

3.
Miyagawa M, Nishiyama Y, Uetani T, Ogimoto A, Ikeda S, Ishimura H . Estimation of myocardial flow reserve utilizing an ultrafast cardiac SPECT: Comparison with coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve, and the SYNTAX score. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 244:347-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.012. View

4.
Chen L, Hung H, Jong B, Lin S, Yeh C, Ku C . A method to measure the extent of myocardial ischemia and steal with SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation. Ann Nucl Med. 2020; 34(9):682-690. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01493-4. View

5.
Giubbini R, Bertoli M, Durmo R, Bonacina M, Peli A, Faggiano I . Comparison between NNH-PET and Tc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 28(5):1906-1918. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01939-x. View