» Articles » PMID: 33704821

Setting a Protective Threshold Value for Silver Toward Freshwater Organisms

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 11
PMID 33704821
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Driven by Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and the European Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC, we have re-evaluated the available chronic freshwater ecotoxicity data for ionic silver (Ag) using strict data quality criteria. In addition, we generated new chronic ecotoxicity data for species potentially sensitive to Ag (the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, the cyanobacteria Anabaena flos-aquae, and the aquatic plant Lemna minor) using Ag nitrate as the test substance. The 10% effect concentrations for the most sensitive endpoint per test species were 0.31 µg dissolved Ag/L for B. calyciflorus (population size), 0.41 µg dissolved Ag/L for A. flos-aquae (growth rate), and 1.40 µg dissolved Ag/L for L. minor (root length). We included these values in the set of reliable chronic freshwater data, subsequently covering a total of 12 taxonomic groups and 15 species. Finally, we applied a species sensitivity distribution approach to the data set using various models. The best-fitting model (Rayleigh distribution) resulted in a threshold value protective for 95% of the species of 0.116 µg dissolved Ag/L. This value is considered reliable and conservative in terms of species protection and can be used as a solid basis for setting thresholds for Ag in freshwater after application of an appropriate assessment factor. Furthermore, this value represents reasonable worst-case conditions for bioavailability in European Union surface waters (low hardness and low dissolved organic carbon). Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1678-1693. © 2021 European Precious Metals Federation. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Citing Articles

Proposal of novel Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNEC) for metals in freshwater using Species Sensitivity Distribution for different taxonomic groups.

Alves Miranda G, Soares Dos Santos F, Lourenco Pereira Cardoso M, Etterson M, C Amorim C, V M Starling M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8180.

PMID: 40065064 PMC: 11894190. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92692-4.

References
1.
Moermond C, Kase R, Korkaric M, Agerstrand M . CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2015; 35(5):1297-309. DOI: 10.1002/etc.3259. View

2.
Holcombe G, Phipps G, Fiandt J . Toxicity of selected priority pollutants to various aquatic organisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1983; 7(4):400-9. DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(83)90005-2. View

3.
Aldenberg T, Slob W . Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1993; 25(1):48-63. DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1993.1006. View

4.
Snell T, Moffat B, Janssen C, Persoone G . Acute toxicity tests using rotifers. IV. Effects of cyst age, temperature, and salinity on the sensitivity of Brachionus calyciflorus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1991; 21(3):308-17. DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(91)90070-6. View

5.
Rai L, Raizada M, Mallick N, Husaini Y, Singh A, Dubey S . Effect of four heavy metals on the biology of Nostoc muscorum. Biol Met. 1990; 2(4):229-34. DOI: 10.1007/BF01141365. View