» Articles » PMID: 33690149

Exploring Commissioners' Understandings of Early Primary Care Network Development: Qualitative Interview Study

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Mar 10
PMID 33690149
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Primary care networks (PCNs) are financially incentivised groupings of general practices in the English NHS. Their purpose is to deliver a number of policy goals set out in . Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) have a role in their establishment, support, and oversight.

Aim: To explore commissioners' perspectives on the early development of PCNs.

Design And Setting: Qualitative study of CCG staff using telephone interviews.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 37 CCG employees involved in PCN establishment. Interviewees were asked about local PCNs' characteristics, factors shaping development and form, activities to date, challenges and benefits, and their CCGs' relationship with PCNs. Interviewee responses were summarised within a matrix and analysed thematically.

Results: Three meta-themes were identified: the multifaceted role of the commissioner, tensions between PCN policy and locally commissioned services, and engaging the broader system. Interviewees reported that the policy potentially favours those PCNs working from a 'blank slate' and does not sufficiently account for the fact some GP practices and wider system organisations have been doing similar work already. The prescriptive, contractual nature of the policy has led to local challenges, trying to ensure that local good practices are not lost during implementation. Interviewees also considered an important part of their work to be protecting PCNs from the weight of expectations placed on them.

Conclusion: CCGs are well placed to understand the complexities of local systems and to facilitate PCNs and working practices between wider system partners. It is important that this local role is not lost as CCGs continue to merge and cover larger geographical populations.

Citing Articles

Impact of research activity on performance of general practices: a qualitative study.

Kenning C, Usher-Smith J, Jamison J, Jones J, Boaz A, Little P BJGP Open. 2024; 8(3).

PMID: 38649161 PMC: 11523510. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0073.


Exploring whether primary care networks can contribute to the national goal of reducing health inequalities: a mixed-methods study.

Warwick-Giles L, Hutchinson J, Checkland K, Hammond J, Bramwell D, Bailey S Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 74(742):e290-e299.

PMID: 38164529 PMC: 11060797. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0258.


Primary care networks as a means of supporting primary care: findings from qualitative case study-based evaluation in the English NHS.

Checkland K, Bramwell D, Warwick-Giles L, Bailey S, Hammond J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e075111.

PMID: 37989389 PMC: 10668191. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075111.


Integration of a clinical pharmacist workforce into newly forming primary care networks: a qualitatively driven, complex systems analysis.

Mills T, Madden M, Stewart D, Gough B, McCambridge J BMJ Open. 2022; 12(11):e066025.

PMID: 36328385 PMC: 9639102. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066025.


Transforming primary care in Scotland: a critical policy analysis.

Stewart E, Donaghy E, Guthrie B, Henderson D, Huang H, Pickersgill M Br J Gen Pract. 2022; 72(719):292-294.

PMID: 35618463 PMC: 9172236. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X719765.

References
1.
Charlesworth A, Bloor K . 70 years of NHS funding debate: how do we know how much is enough?. BMJ. 2018; 361:k2373. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k2373. View

2.
Morciano M, Checkland K, Hammond J, Lau Y, Sutton M . Variability in size and characteristics of primary care networks in England: observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2020; 70(701):e899-e905. PMC: 7643821. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713441. View

3.
Owen K, Hopkins T, Shortland T, Dale J . GP retention in the UK: a worsening crisis. Findings from a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(2):e026048. PMC: 6398901. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026048. View

4.
Checkland K, Hammond J, Warwick-Giles L, Bailey S . Exploring the multiple policy objectives for primary care networks: a qualitative interview study with national policy stakeholders. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(7):e038398. PMC: 7337885. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038398. View

5.
McDermott I, Checkland K, Moran V, Warwick-Giles L . Achieving integrated care through commissioning of primary care services in the English NHS: a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e027622. PMC: 6500348. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027622. View