» Articles » PMID: 33689919

Sample Size Considerations for Matched-pair Cluster Randomization Design with Incomplete Observations of Continuous Outcomes

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Mar 10
PMID 33689919
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Matched-pair cluster randomization design is becoming increasingly used in clinical and health behavioral studies. Investigators often encounter incomplete observations in the data collected. Statistical inference for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations has been extensively studied in literature. However, sample size method for such study design is sparsely available. We propose a closed-form sample size formula for matched-pair cluster randomization design with continuous outcomes, based on the generalized estimating equation approach by treating incomplete observations as missing data in a marginal linear model. The sample size formula is flexible to accommodate different correlation structures, missing patterns, and magnitude of missingness. In the presence of missing data, the proposed method would lead to a more accurate sample size estimation than the crude adjustment method. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the finite-sample performance of the proposed sample size method under various design configurations. We use bias-corrected variance estimators to address the issue of inflated type I error when the number of clusters per group is small. A real application example of physical fitness study in Ecuadorian adolescents is presented for illustration.

Citing Articles

Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of cluster randomized trials for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.

Tong J, Li F, Harhay M, Tong G BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):85.

PMID: 37024809 PMC: 10077680. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01887-8.

References
1.
Zhu H, Zhang S, Ahn C . Sample size considerations for split-mouth design. Stat Methods Med Res. 2015; 26(6):2543-2551. PMC: 5573650. DOI: 10.1177/0962280215601137. View

2.
Andrade S, Lachat C, Ochoa-Aviles A, Verstraeten R, Huybregts L, Roberfroid D . A school-based intervention improves physical fitness in Ecuadorian adolescents: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:153. PMC: 4272792. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-014-0153-5. View

3.
Bavarian N, Lewis K, DuBois D, Acock A, Vuchinich S, Silverthorn N . Using social-emotional and character development to improve academic outcomes: a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial in low-income, urban schools. J Sch Health. 2013; 83(11):771-9. PMC: 3851096. DOI: 10.1111/josh.12093. View

4.
Zhang S, Ahn C . Sample size calculation for time-averaged differences in the presence of missing data. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(3):550-6. PMC: 3370397. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.004. View

5.
Boult C, Leff B, Boyd C, Wolff J, Marsteller J, Frick K . A matched-pair cluster-randomized trial of guided care for high-risk older patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28(5):612-21. PMC: 3631081. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2287-y. View