» Articles » PMID: 33688110

Behaviour Before Beauty: Signal Weighting During Mate Selection in the Butterfly

Overview
Journal Ethology
Date 2021 Mar 10
PMID 33688110
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mating displays often contain multiple signals. Different combinations of these signals may be equally successful at attracting a mate, as environment and signal combination may influence relative signal weighting by choosy individuals. This variation in signal weighting among choosy individuals may facilitate the maintenance of polymorphic displays and signalling behaviour. One group of animals known for their polymorphic patterning are Batesian mimetic butterflies, where the interaction of sexual selection and predation pressures are hypothesized to influence the maintenance of polymorphic wing patterning and behaviour. Males in the female-limited polymorphic Batesian mimetic butterfly use female wing pattern and female activity levels when determining whom to court. They court stationary females with mimetic wing patterns more often than stationary females with non-mimetic, male-like wing patterns, and active females more often than inactive females. It is unclear whether females modify their behaviour to increase (or decrease) their likelihood of receiving male courtship, or whether non-mimetic females spend more time in cryptic environments than mimetic females, to compensate for their lack of mimicry-driven predation protection (at the cost of decreased visibility to males). In addition, relative signal weighting of female wing pattern and activity to male mate selection is unknown. To address these questions, we conducted a series of observational studies of a polymorphic population in a large butterfly enclosure. We found that males exclusively courted active females, irrespective of female wing pattern. However, males did court active non-mimetic females significantly more often than expected given their relative abundance in the population. Females exhibited similar activity levels, and selected similar resting environments, irrespective of wing pattern. Our results suggest that male preference for non-mimetic females may play an active role in the maintenance of the non-mimetic female form in natural populations, where males are likely to be in the presence of active, as well as inactive, mimetic and non-mimetic females.

Citing Articles

Pattern Matters in the Aposematic Colouration of Butterflies.

Lim H, Chan I, Monteiro A Insects. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057198 PMC: 11277510. DOI: 10.3390/insects15070465.


Phenotypic Plasticity of the Mimetic Swallowtail Butterfly : Color Pattern Modifications and Their Implications in Mimicry Evolution.

Shimajiri T, Otaki J Insects. 2022; 13(7).

PMID: 35886825 PMC: 9322193. DOI: 10.3390/insects13070649.


Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimic butterflies.

Komata S, Kajitani R, Itoh T, Fujiwara H Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1856):20210198.

PMID: 35694751 PMC: 9189499. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0198.


Lack of inbreeding avoidance during mate selection in migratory monarch butterflies.

Villa S, Kelly K, Hollimon M, Protil 3rd K, de Roode J Behav Processes. 2022; 198:104630.

PMID: 35381312 PMC: 10375862. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104630.


Batesian mimicry has evolved with deleterious effects of the pleiotropic gene doublesex.

Komata S, Kitamura T, Fujiwara H Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21333.

PMID: 33288816 PMC: 7721872. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78055-1.

References
1.
Levin M . PREFERENTIAL MATING AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SEX-LIMITED DIMORPHISM IN PAPILIO GLAUCUS: EVIDENCE FROM LABORATORY MATINGS. Evolution. 2017; 27(2):257-264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb00670.x. View

2.
Morehouse N, Rutowski R . In the eyes of the beholders: Female choice and avian predation risk associated with an exaggerated male butterfly color. Am Nat. 2010; 176(6):768-84. DOI: 10.1086/657043. View

3.
Candolin U . The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004; 78(4):575-95. DOI: 10.1017/s1464793103006158. View

4.
Chouteau M, Llaurens V, Piron-Prunier F, Joron M . Polymorphism at a mimicry supergene maintained by opposing frequency-dependent selection pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(31):8325-8329. PMC: 5547605. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702482114. View

5.
Prudic K, Jeon C, Cao H, Monteiro A . Developmental plasticity in sexual roles of butterfly species drives mutual sexual ornamentation. Science. 2011; 331(6013):73-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1197114. View