» Articles » PMID: 33687666

Feature-based Attention is Not Confined by Object Boundaries: Spatially Global Enhancement of Irrelevant Features

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 Mar 9
PMID 33687666
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Theories of visual attention differ in what they identify as the core unit of selection. Feature-based theories emphasize basic visual features (e.g., color, motion), demonstrated through enhancement of attended features throughout the visual field, while object-based theories propose that attention enhances all features belonging to the same object. These theories make distinct predictions about the processing of features that are not attended primarily: Object-based theories predict that such secondary, task-irrelevant features are enhanced within object boundaries, while feature-based theories predict enhancement of irrelevant features across locations, regardless of objecthood. To test these two accounts, we had participants attend a set of colored dots among distractor dots (moving coherently upward or downward) to detect brief luminance decreases, while simultaneously detecting speed changes in other sets of dots in the opposite visual field. In the first experiment, we demonstrate that participants have higher speed detection rates in the dot array that matched the motion direction of the attended color array, although motion direction was task-irrelevant. In a second experiment, we manipulated the probability that speed changes occurred in the matching motion direction and found that enhancement of the irrelevant motion direction persisted even when it was detrimental for task performance, suggesting that spatially global effects of feature-based attention cannot easily be flexibly adjusted. Overall, these results indicate that features that are not primarily attended are enhanced globally, surpassing object boundaries.

Citing Articles

The time course of feature-selective attention inside and outside the focus of spatial attention.

Andersen S, Hillyard S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(16):e2309975121.

PMID: 38588433 PMC: 11032453. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309975121.


Representational structures as a unifying framework for attention.

Chapman A, Stormer V Trends Cogn Sci. 2024; 28(5):416-427.

PMID: 38280837 PMC: 11290436. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.002.


Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks.

Chapman A, Stormer V J Vis. 2022; 22(8):4.

PMID: 35834377 PMC: 9290316. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.8.4.

References
1.
Adamian N, Andersen S, Hillyard S . Parallel attentional facilitation of features and objects in early visual cortex. Psychophysiology. 2019; 57(3):e13498. PMC: 7027440. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13498. View

2.
Andersen S, Hillyard S, Muller M . Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(13):1006-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.030. View

3.
Andersen S, Hillyard S, Muller M . Global facilitation of attended features is obligatory and restricts divided attention. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(46):18200-7. PMC: 3828469. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1913-13.2013. View

4.
Andersen S, Muller M, Hillyard S . Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(27):9912-9. PMC: 6605409. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5268-14.2015. View

5.
Boynton G, Ciaramitaro V, Arman A . Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations. Vision Res. 2006; 46(18):2968-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.003. View