» Articles » PMID: 33687618

The Cost of Chemotherapy Administration: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Mar 9
PMID 33687618
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Cancer treatment is a significant driver of healthcare costs worldwide, however, the economic impact of treating patients with anti-neoplastic agents is poorly elucidated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the direct costs associated with administering intravenous chemotherapy in an outpatient setting.

Methods: We systematically searched four databases from 2010 to present and extracted hourly administration costs and the respective components of each estimate. Separate analyses were conducted of Canadian and United States (US) studies, respectively, to address a priori hypotheses regarding heterogeneity amongst estimates. The Drummond checklist was used to assess risk-of-bias. Data were summarized using medians with interquartile ranges and five outliers were identified; costs were presented in 2019 USD.

Results: Forty-four studies were analyzed, including sub-analyses of 19 US and seven Canadian studies. 26/44 studies were of moderate-high quality. When components of administration cost were evaluated, physician costs were reported most frequently (24 studies), followed by lab tests (13) and overhead costs (9). The median estimate (excluding outliers) was $142/hour (IQR = $103-166). The median administration cost in the US was $149/hour (IQR = $118-158), and was $128/hour (IQR = $102-137) in Canada.

Conclusions: There is currently a paucity of literature addressing the costs of chemotherapy administration, and existing studies utilize a patchwork of reporting methodologies which renders direct comparison challenging. Our results demonstrate that the cost of administering chemotherapy is approximately $125-150/hour, globally. This value is dependent upon the region of analysis, inclusiveness of cost subcomponents as well as the methodology used to estimate unit prices, as described here.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Aerobic Training for Adverse Symptoms Related to Chemotherapy During Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Cost-Effectiveness Assessment.

Selles W, Miyamoto G, Santos E, Carmo C, Moura G, Santos G JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e60828.

PMID: 39163116 PMC: 11372328. DOI: 10.2196/60828.


A Sensitive Assay for Unbound Docetaxel Using Ultrafiltration plus HPLC-MS and Its Application to a Clinical Study.

Wang D, Hughes-Medlicott N, Klingler L, Wang Y, Hung N, Duffull S Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38794263 PMC: 11124465. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050602.


Oral docetaxel plus encequidar - A pharmacokinetic model and evaluation against IV docetaxel.

Wang D, Jackson C, Hung N, Hung T, Kwan R, Chan W J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2024; 51(4):335-352.

PMID: 38504032 PMC: 11254990. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-024-09913-y.


Healthcare costs of cancer among children, adolescents, and young adults: A scoping review.

Nabukalu D, Gordon L, Lowe J, Merollini K Cancer Med. 2024; 13(3):e6925.

PMID: 38214042 PMC: 10905233. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6925.

References
1.
Albaba H, Lim C, Leighl N . Economic Considerations in the Use of Novel Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer: Review of Current Literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017; 35(12):1195-1209. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0563-8. View

2.
Nabhan C, Feinberg B . Value-Based Calculators in Cancer: Current State and Challenges. J Oncol Pract. 2017; 13(8):499-506. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2017.022947. View

3.
Turner A . Promoting continence--continence advice. Geriatr Nurs Home Care. 1989; 9(3):22-3. View

4.
Drummond M, Jefferson T . Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ. 1996; 313(7052):275-83. PMC: 2351717. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275. View

5.
Saxton A, Poenaru D, Ozgediz D, Ameh E, Farmer D, Smith E . Economic Analysis of Children's Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0165480. PMC: 5085034. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165480. View