» Articles » PMID: 33687519

Prognostic Benefit from an Early Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTEACS): Evaluation of the New Risk Stratification in the NSTEACS European Guidelines

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of our work is to evaluate the prognostic benefit of an early invasive strategy in patients with high-risk NSTACS according to the recommendations of the 2020 clinical practice guidelines during long-term follow-up.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 6454 consecutive NSTEACS patients. We analyze the effects of early coronary angiography (< 24 h) in patients with: (a) GRACE risk score > 140 and (b) patients with "established NSTEMI" (non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction defined by an increase in troponins) or dynamic ST-T-segment changes with a GRACE risk score < 140.

Results: From 2003 to 2017, 6454 patients with "new high-risk NSTEACS" were admitted, and 6031 (93.45%) of these underwent coronary angiography. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the long-term cumulative probability of being free of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE differed significantly due to an early coronary intervention in patients with NSTEACS and GRACE > 140 [HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.57-0.67), HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.56-0.68), HR 0.57 (IC 95% 0.53-0.61), respectively]. In patients with NSTEACS and GRACE < 140 with established NSTEMI or ST/T-segment changes, the benefit of the early invasive strategy is only observed in the reduction of MACE [HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.56-0.68)], but not for total mortality [HR 0.96 (IC 95% 0.78-1.2)] and cardiovascular mortality [HR 0.96 (IC 95% 0.75-1.24)].

Conclusions: An early invasive management is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE in NSTEACS with high GRACE risk score. However, this benefit is less evident in the subgroup of patients with a GRACE score < 140 with established NSTEMI or ST/T-segment changes.

Citing Articles

A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus.

AlHabeeb W, Elasfar A, Kinsara A, Aljizeeri A, Jelaidan I, Alghalayini K J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025; 36(4):385-407.

PMID: 39822337 PMC: 11737320. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1407.


Left atrial strain predicts risk and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective study with external validation.

Li Y, Shen W, Duan X, Li Y, Wang Y, Ren X Heliyon. 2022; 8(11):e11276.

PMID: 36353174 PMC: 9638755. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11276.

References
1.
Go A, Mozaffarian D, Roger V, Benjamin E, Berry J, Borden W . Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 127(1):e6-e245. PMC: 5408511. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. View

2.
Mehta S, Granger C, Boden W, Steg P, Bassand J, Faxon D . Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(21):2165-75. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807986. View

3.
Kofoed K, Kelbaek H, Hansen P, Torp-Pedersen C, Hofsten D, Klovgaard L . Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation. 2018; 138(24):2741-2750. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037152. View

4.
Montalescot G, Dabbous O, Lim M, Flather M, Mehta R . Relation of timing of cardiac catheterization to outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris enrolled in the multinational global registry of acute coronary events. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95(12):1397-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.004. View

5.
Riezebos R, Ronner E, Ter Bals E, Slagboom T, Smits P, Ten Berg J . Immediate versus deferred coronary angioplasty in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2008; 95(10):807-12. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.154815. View