Regional Amyloid Burden Differences Evaluated Using Quantitative Cardiac MRI in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the regional amyloid burden and myocardial deformation using T1 mapping and strain values in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) according to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) patterns.
Materials And Methods: Forty patients with CA were divided into 2 groups per LGE pattern, and 15 healthy subjects were enrolled. Global and regional native T1 and T2 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-feature tracking strain values were compared in an intergroup and interregional manner.
Results: Of the patients with CA, 32 had diffuse global LGE (group 2), and 8 had focal patchy or no LGE (group 1). Global native T1, T2, and ECV were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in the control group (native T1: 1384.4 ms vs. 1466.8 ms vs. 1230.5 ms; T2: 53.8 ms vs. 54.2 ms vs. 48.9 ms; and ECV: 36.9% vs. 51.4% vs. 26.0%, respectively; all, < 0.001). Basal ECV (53.7%) was significantly higher than the mid and apical ECVs (50.1% and 50.0%, respectively; < 0.001) in group 2. Basal and mid peak radial strains (PRSs) and peak circumferential strains (PCSs) were significantly lower than the apical PRS and PCS, respectively (PRS, 15.6% vs. 16.7% vs. 26.9%; and PCS, -9.7% vs. -10.9% vs. -15.0%; all, < 0.001). Basal ECV and basal strain (2-dimensional PRS) in group 2 showed a significant negative correlation ( = -0.623, < 0.001). Group 1 showed no regional ECV differences (basal, 37.0%; mid, 35.9%; and apical, 38.3%; = 0.184).
Conclusion: Quantitative T1 mapping parameters such as native T1 and ECV may help diagnose early CA. ECV, in particular, can reflect regional differences in the amyloid deposition in patients with advanced CA, and increased basal ECV is related to decreased basal strain. Therefore, quantitative CMR parameters may help diagnose CA and determine its severity in patients with or without LGE.
Echocardiographic red flags of ATTR cardiomyopathy a single centre validation.
Henein M, Pilebro B, Lindqvist P Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024; 2(3):qyae105.
PMID: 39679323 PMC: 11645131. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae105.
Nai R, Liu J, Zhao K, Ma S, Ma W, He J Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(11):400.
PMID: 39618870 PMC: 11607509. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2511400.
Clinical and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Cardiac Amyloidosis.
Tana M, Tana C, Panarese A, Mantini C, Ricci F, Porreca E Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(10):291.
PMID: 39077571 PMC: 11273132. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2410291.
Cha M, Kim C, Park C, Hong Y, Shin J, Kim T Korean J Radiol. 2022; 23(6):581-597.
PMID: 35555885 PMC: 9174501. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0815.
Multimodality Imaging in the Evaluation and Prognostication of Cardiac Amyloidosis.
Scheel 3rd P, Mukherjee M, Hays A, Vaishnav J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:787618.
PMID: 35402557 PMC: 8989413. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.787618.