» Articles » PMID: 33686708

Comparison of Three Biopsy Forceps for Hysteroscopic Endometrial Biopsy in Postmenopausal Patients (HYGREB-1): A Multicenter, Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Mar 9
PMID 33686708
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare three types of biopsy forceps for hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women.

Methods: Postmenopausal women undergoing operative hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding or endometrial thickness (≥5 mm) were included. Operative hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy was performed by hysteroscopic forceps. Women were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) in three groups and allocated to undergo endometrial biopsy by hysteroscopy using spoon, alligator, or snake forceps.

Results: Seventy-five women were included in the study, 25 in each group. The duration of the biopsy was comparable between the three groups (P = 0.334) with a median of 180 seconds (range 20-480 seconds). No differences were observed about the number of attempts (P = 0.602), the use of another instrument (P = 0.276), and the biopsy appropriateness (P = 0.592). The spoon forceps group reported higher levels of pain compared to the alligator and snake forceps groups (P < 0.001). The spoon forceps received significantly lower scores by the operator compared to the alligator and snake forceps (P < 0.001). The alligator and snake forceps reported wider biopsy than the spoon forceps (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Snake and alligator hysteroscopic forceps may be considered the first choice to perform an endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03427957.

Citing Articles

Sedoanalgesia with dexmedetomidine in daily anesthesia practices: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Oguz A, Soyalp C, Tuncdemir Y, Tekeli A, Yuzkat N BMC Anesthesiol. 2025; 25(1):45.

PMID: 39881245 PMC: 11776121. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-025-02918-1.


Surgical parameters affecting procedure duration of hysteroscopic fibroid resection: results of a retrospective longitudinal study.

Riemma G, Vitale S, Liptak M, Ciebiera M, Boldogh B, Mereu L Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 311(1):91-98.

PMID: 39715840 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5.


Safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy for the investigation of type II endometrial cancer: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Yang W, Zhao X, Pan J, Zhi Z BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e087582.

PMID: 39486826 PMC: 11529467. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087582.


Efficacy of Hysteroscopy in Improving Fertility Outcomes in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Vitale S, Angioni S, Parry J, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Haimovich S, Carugno J Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023; 88(6):336-348.

PMID: 37899034 PMC: 10794974. DOI: 10.1159/000534794.


C-section technique vs minilaparotomy after minimally invasive uterine surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Della Corte L, Guarino M, Vitale S, Angioni S, Mercorio A, Bifulco G Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 309(1):219-226.

PMID: 37796281 PMC: 10769909. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07239-7.