» Articles » PMID: 33686091

Key Factors in a Rigorous Longitudinal Image-based Assessment of Retinopathy of Prematurity

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Mar 9
PMID 33686091
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To describe a database of longitudinally graded telemedicine retinal images to be used as a comparator for future studies assessing grader recall bias and ability to detect typical progression (e.g. International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ICROP) stages) as well as incremental changes in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Cohort comprised of retinal images from 84 eyes of 42 patients who were sequentially screened for ROP over 6 consecutive weeks in a telemedicine program and then followed to vascular maturation or treatment, and then disease stabilization. De-identified retinal images across the 6 weekly exams (2520 total images) were graded by an ROP expert based on whether ROP had improved, worsened, or stayed the same compared to the prior week's images, corresponding to an overall clinical "gestalt" score. Subsequently, we examined which parameters might have influenced the examiner's ability to detect longitudinal change; images were graded by the same ROP expert by image view (central, inferior, nasal, superior, temporal) and by retinal components (vascular tortuosity, vascular dilation, stage, hemorrhage, vessel growth), again determining if each particular retinal component or ROP in each image view had improved, worsened, or stayed the same compared to the prior week's images. Agreement between gestalt scores and view, component, and component by view scores was assessed using percent agreement, absolute agreement, and Cohen's weighted kappa statistic to determine if any of the hypothesized image features correlated with the ability to predict ROP disease trajectory in patients. The central view showed substantial agreement with gestalt scores (κ = 0.63), with moderate agreement in the remaining views. Of retinal components, vascular tortuosity showed the most overall agreement with gestalt (κ = 0.42-0.61), with only slight to fair agreement for all other components. This is a well-defined ROP database graded by one expert in a real-world setting in a masked fashion that correlated with the actual (remote in time) exams and known outcomes. This provides a foundation for subsequent study of telemedicine's ability to longitudinally assess ROP disease trajectory, as well as for potential artificial intelligence approaches to retinal image grading, in order to expand patient access to timely, accurate ROP screening.

Citing Articles

Telemedicine retinopathy of prematurity severity score (TeleROP-SS) versus modified activity score (mROP-ActS) retrospective comparison in SUNDROP cohort.

Xu C, Adu-Brimpong J, Moshfeghi H, Rosenblatt T, Yu M, Ji M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15219.

PMID: 37709791 PMC: 10502047. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42150-w.


Effective field of view of wide-field fundus photography in the Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP).

Ji M, Zaidi M, Bodnar Z, Wang S, Kumm J, Moshfeghi D Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19276.

PMID: 36369465 PMC: 9652357. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22964-w.


Advantages of Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography in the Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Nguyen T, Ni S, Khan S, Wei X, Ostmo S, Chiang M Front Pediatr. 2022; 9:797684.

PMID: 35118032 PMC: 8806029. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.797684.

References
1.
Daniel E, Quinn G, Hildebrand P, Ells A, Hubbard 3rd G, Capone Jr A . Validated System for Centralized Grading of Retinopathy of Prematurity: Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015; 133(6):675-82. PMC: 4910817. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0460. View

2.
Prakalapakorn S, Freedman S, Hutchinson A, Saehout P, Cetinkaya-Rundel M, Wallace D . Real-World Simulation of an Alternative Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening System in Thailand: A Pilot Study. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018; 55(4):245-253. PMC: 6482815. DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20180327-04. View

3.
Kalpathy-Cramer J, Campbell J, Erdogmus D, Tian P, Kedarisetti D, Moleta C . Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Improving Diagnosis by Ranking Disease Severity and Using Quantitative Image Analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(11):2345-2351. PMC: 5077696. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.020. View

4.
Valentine P, Jackson J, KALINA R, Woodrum D . Increased survival of low birth weight infants: impact on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 1989; 84(3):442-5. View

5.
Williams S, Wang L, Kane S, Lee T, Weissgold D, Berrocal A . Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: accuracy of expert versus non-expert graders. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 94(3):351-6. PMC: 3711625. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.166348. View