» Articles » PMID: 33684054

COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter in Four Asian Countries: Case Study of Risk Communication

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2021 Mar 8
PMID 33684054
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to a global pandemic. The World Health Organization has also declared an infodemic (ie, a plethora of information regarding COVID-19 containing both false and accurate information circulated on the internet). Hence, it has become critical to test the veracity of information shared online and analyze the evolution of discussed topics among citizens related to the pandemic.

Objective: This research analyzes the public discourse on COVID-19. It characterizes risk communication patterns in four Asian countries with outbreaks at varying degrees of severity: South Korea, Iran, Vietnam, and India.

Methods: We collected tweets on COVID-19 from four Asian countries in the early phase of the disease outbreak from January to March 2020. The data set was collected by relevant keywords in each language, as suggested by locals. We present a method to automatically extract a time-topic cohesive relationship in an unsupervised fashion based on natural language processing. The extracted topics were evaluated qualitatively based on their semantic meanings.

Results: This research found that each government's official phases of the epidemic were not well aligned with the degree of public attention represented by the daily tweet counts. Inspired by the issue-attention cycle theory, the presented natural language processing model can identify meaningful transition phases in the discussed topics among citizens. The analysis revealed an inverse relationship between the tweet count and topic diversity.

Conclusions: This paper compares similarities and differences of pandemic-related social media discourse in Asian countries. We observed multiple prominent peaks in the daily tweet counts across all countries, indicating multiple issue-attention cycles. Our analysis identified which topics the public concentrated on; some of these topics were related to misinformation and hate speech. These findings and the ability to quickly identify key topics can empower global efforts to fight against an infodemic during a pandemic.

Citing Articles

Harnessing Social Media Data to Understand Information Needs About Kidney Diseases and Emotional Experiences With Disease Management: Topic and Sentiment Analysis.

Hwang H, Kim N, You J, Ryu H, Kim S, Yoon Park J J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e64838.

PMID: 39998877 PMC: 11897675. DOI: 10.2196/64838.


People's Attitude and Perception of the Pandemic on Twitter: A Case Study of COVID-19 in India.

Pv M, Karmegam D, Saravanan S Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76320.

PMID: 39850180 PMC: 11756616. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76320.


Global prevalence and content of information about alcohol use as a cancer risk factor on Twitter.

King A, Dunbar N, Margolin D, Chunara R, Tong C, Jih-Vieira L Prev Med. 2023; 177:107728.

PMID: 37844803 PMC: 10872596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107728.


Leveraging twitter data to understand nurses' emotion dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Zhou J, Sheppard-Law S, Xiao C, Smith J, Lamb A, Axisa C Health Inf Sci Syst. 2023; 11(1):28.

PMID: 37359480 PMC: 10289963. DOI: 10.1007/s13755-023-00228-9.


COVID-19-Associated Misinformation Across the South Asian Diaspora: Qualitative Study of WhatsApp Messages.

Sharma A, Khosla K, Potharaju K, Mukherjea A, Sarkar U JMIR Infodemiology. 2023; 3:e38607.

PMID: 37113380 PMC: 10013129. DOI: 10.2196/38607.


References
1.
Anderson A, Brossard D, Scheufele D . News coverage of controversial emerging technologies. Evidence for the issue attention cycle in print and online media. Politics Life Sci. 2013; 31(1-2):87-96. DOI: 10.2990/31_1-2_87. View

2.
Imran A, Daudpota S, Kastrati Z, Batra R . Cross-Cultural Polarity and Emotion Detection Using Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning on COVID-19 Related Tweets. IEEE Access. 2021; 8:181074-181090. PMC: 8545282. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027350. View

3.
Shimizu K . 2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism. Lancet. 2020; 395(10225):685-686. PMC: 7133552. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30357-3. View

4.
Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S . The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018; 359(6380):1146-1151. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9559. View

5.
Jang K, Baek Y . When Information from Public Health Officials is Untrustworthy: The Use of Online News, Interpersonal Networks, and Social Media during the MERS Outbreak in South Korea. Health Commun. 2018; 34(9):991-998. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1449552. View