Asymmetries in Accessing Vowel Representations Are Driven by Phonological and Acoustic Properties: Neural and Behavioral Evidence From Natural German Minimal Pairs

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2021 Mar 8

PMID 33679344

Authors

Miriam Riedinger

Arne Nagels

Alexander Werth

Mathias Scharinger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In vowel discrimination, commonly found discrimination patterns are directional asymmetries where discrimination is faster (or easier) if differing vowels are presented in a certain sequence compared to the reversed sequence. Different models of speech sound processing try to account for these asymmetries based on either phonetic or phonological properties. In this study, we tested and compared two of those often-discussed models, namely the Featurally Underspecified Lexicon (FUL) model (Lahiri and Reetz, 2002) and the Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework (Polka and Bohn, 2011). While most studies presented isolated vowels, we investigated a large stimulus set of German vowels in a more naturalistic setting within minimal pairs. We conducted an mismatch negativity (MMN) study in a passive and a reaction time study in an active oddball paradigm. In both data sets, we found directional asymmetries that can be explained by either phonological or phonetic theories. While behaviorally, the vowel discrimination was based on phonological properties, both tested models failed to explain the found neural patterns comprehensively. Therefore, we additionally examined the influence of a variety of articulatory, acoustical, and lexical factors (e.g., formant structure, intensity, duration, and frequency of occurrence) but also the influence of factors beyond the well-known (perceived loudness of vowels, degree of openness) in depth multiple regression analyses. The analyses revealed that the perceptual factor of perceived loudness has a greater impact than considered in the literature and should be taken stronger into consideration when analyzing preattentive natural vowel processing.

References

Tervaniemi M, Schroger E, Saher M, Naatanen R . Effects of spectral complexity and sound duration on automatic complex-sound pitch processing in humans - a mismatch negativity study. Neurosci Lett. 2000; 290(1):66-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01290-8. View

Endrass T, Mohr B, Pulvermuller F . Enhanced mismatch negativity brain response after binaural word presentation. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19(6):1653-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03247.x. View

Pakarinen S, Teinonen T, Shestakova A, Kwon M, Kujala T, Hamalainen H . Fast parametric evaluation of central speech-sound processing with mismatch negativity (MMN). Int J Psychophysiol. 2012; 87(1):103-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.11.010. View

Jacobsen T, Horenkamp T, Schroger E . Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity. Audiol Neurootol. 2003; 8(6):338-46. DOI: 10.1159/000073518. View

Takegata R, Paavilainen P, Naatanen R, Winkler I . Preattentive processing of spectral, temporal, and structural characteristics of acoustic regularities: a mismatch negativity study. Psychophysiology. 2001; 38(1):92-8. View

Pulvermuller F, Shtyrov Y, Ilmoniemi R, Marslen-Wilson W . Tracking speech comprehension in space and time. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):1297-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.030. View

Tyler M, Best C, Faber A, Levitt A . Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica. 2014; 71(1):4-21. PMC: 4143388. DOI: 10.1159/000356237. View

Masapollo M, Polka L, Molnar M, Menard L . Directional asymmetries reveal a universal bias in adult vowel perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141(4):2857. DOI: 10.1121/1.4981006. View

Pulvermuller F, Kujala T, Shtyrov Y, Simola J, Tiitinen H, Alku P . Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(3):607-16. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0864. View

10.

Masapollo M, Polka L, Menard L, Franklin L, Tiede M, Morgan J . Asymmetries in unimodal visual vowel perception: The roles of oral-facial kinematics, orientation, and configuration. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018; 44(7):1103-1118. PMC: 6037555. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000518. View

11.

Langers D, van Dijk P, Schoenmaker E, Backes W . fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness. Neuroimage. 2007; 35(2):709-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.013. View

12.

Takegata R, Morotomi T . Integrated neural representation of sound and temporal features in human auditory sensory memory: an event-related potential study. Neurosci Lett. 1999; 274(3):207-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00711-9. View

13.

Peter V, McArthur G, Thompson W . Effect of deviance direction and calculation method on duration and frequency mismatch negativity (MMN). Neurosci Lett. 2010; 482(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.010. View

14.

Brysbaert M, Buchmeier M, Conrad M, Jacobs A, Bolte J, Bohl A . The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Exp Psychol. 2011; 58(5):412-24. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123. View

15.

Eulitz C, Lahiri A . Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004; 16(4):577-83. DOI: 10.1162/089892904323057308. View

16.

Friedrich C, Lahiri A, Eulitz C . Neurophysiological evidence for underspecified lexical representations: asymmetries with word initial variations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008; 34(6):1545-59. DOI: 10.1037/a0012481. View

17.

Pettigrew C, Murdoch B, Ponton C, Finnigan S, Alku P, Kei J . Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm. Ear Hear. 2004; 25(3):284-301. DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000130800.88987.03. View

18.

Scharinger M, Monahan P, Idsardi W . Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012; 55(3):903-18. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0065). View

19.

Wolff C, Schroger E . Human pre-attentive auditory change-detection with single, double, and triple deviations as revealed by mismatch negativity additivity. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 311(1):37-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02135-8. View

20.

Emmendorfer A, Correia J, Jansma B, Kotz S, Bonte M . ERP mismatch response to phonological and temporal regularities in speech. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):9917. PMC: 7303198. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66824-x. View