» Articles » PMID: 33679110

Correlation Between Facial Growth Patterns and Cortical Bone Thickness Assessed with Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Young Adult Untreated Patients

Overview
Journal Saudi Dent J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Mar 8
PMID 33679110
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The vertical facial growth pattern is one of the most important issue in the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. Previous studies investigated the association between interdental bone thickness and facial divergence using mainly bidimensional analysis. When two-dimensional dental radiographic views are not sufficient for diagnosis and measurements, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images should be used to assess the alveolar bone structure three-dimensionally and with high accuracy and reliability.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between alveolar bone thickness and facial divergence in young adults untreated patients using a three-dimensional method analysis with CBCT images.

Methods: Records of 30 untreated patients (mean age 16 ± 2 years) with Angle Class I and mild to moderate crowding were analyzed. Subjects were classified as hypodivergent (<39˚), normodivergent (41 ± 2˚), and hyperdivergent (>43°). according to the inter-maxillary angle between the sagittal maxillary plane (ANS-PNS) and the mandibular plane (GN-ME). The alveolar bone thickness measurements were taken for the buccal and palatal/lingual surfaces of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Axial-guided navigation (AGN) was used to locate all landmarks using a specific software (Horos 3.0).

Results: The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the hypodivergent and hyperdivergent group regarding buccal bone height (P = 0.005), buccal apical bone thickness (P = 0.003) and palatal mid-root bone thickness (P = 0.006). Moreover, buccal bone height (P = 0.006) was found to be statistically significant different in normodivergent compared with hypodivergent individuals.

Conclusions: Facial types were found to be correlated with alveolar bone thickness. The hyperdivergent subjects presented thinner alveolus bone in the anterior maxilla and at almost all sites in the mandible. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of thin cortical bone plates in hyperdivergent patients, reducing antero-posterior movements to avoid fenestration and dehiscence.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Bone Anatomy for Ramal Implant Placement and Proximity to the Inferior Alveolar Canal in Different Facial Divergence to Assess the Ideal Site of Placement: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Rathor A, Shah A, Jani B, Vekariya J, Shah M Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78290.

PMID: 40027046 PMC: 11872140. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78290.


The Three-Dimensional Investigation of the Radiographic Boundary of Mandibular Full-Arch Distalization in Different Facial Patterns.

Chou Y, Chan C, Chang Y, Lin S, Cheng C, Wu T J Pers Med. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39590563 PMC: 11595643. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14111071.


Comparison of Upper Central Incisor Torque in the ClinCheck with and without CBCT Integration: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Queiros C, Goncalves M, Ferreira S, de Castro I, Azevedo R, Pinho T Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195113 PMC: 11353991. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080269.


Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults.

Willershausen I, Ehrenfried A, Krautkremer F, Strobel A, Seidel C, Paulsen F Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):55.

PMID: 38157063 PMC: 10756868. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05472-7.


Three-dimensional evaluation of the cortical and cancellous bone density and thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of interradicular area of adults with different facial growth pattern.

Hasani M, Afzoon S, Karandish M, Parastar M BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):753.

PMID: 37833666 PMC: 10571361. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03440-x.


References
1.
Janson G, Bombonatti R, Brandao A, Henriques J, de Freitas M . Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone crest after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(2):157-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00392-5. View

2.
van Vlijmen O, Maal T, Berge S, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A . A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 117(3):300-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00633.x. View

3.
Foosiri P, Mahatumarat K, Panmekiate S . Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23(1):54-62. PMC: 5962248. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar. View

4.
Martinelli F, Luiz R, Faria M, Issamu Nojima L . Anatomic variability in alveolar sites for skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(3):252.e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.027. View

5.
Bresin A . Effects of masticatory muscle function and bite-raising on mandibular morphology in the growing rat. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2002; (150):1-49. View