» Articles » PMID: 33677498

A Cohort Study and Meta-analysis of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension: Searching for a Threshold to Guide Treatment

Overview
Journal Eur Heart J
Date 2021 Mar 7
PMID 33677498
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Whether isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), as defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline, is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been disputed. We aimed to further study the associations of IDH with (i) subclinical CVD in the form of coronary artery calcium (CAC), (ii) incident systolic hypertension, and (iii) CVD events.

Methods And Results: We used multivariable-adjusted logistic and Cox regression to test whether IDH by 2017 ACC/AHA criteria (i.e. systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg) was associated with the above outcomes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). In a random-effects meta-analysis of the association between IDH and CVD events, we combined the MESA results with those from seven other previously published cohort studies. Among the 5104 MESA participants studied, 7.5% had IDH by the 2017 ACC/AHA criteria. There was no association between IDH and CAC [e.g. adjusted prevalence odds ratio for CAC >0 of 0.88 (95% CI 0.66, 1.17)]. Similarly, while IDH was associated with incident systolic hypertension, there was no statistically significant associations with incident CVD [hazard ratio 1.19 (95% CI 0.77, 1.84)] or death [hazard ratio 0.94 (95% CI 0.65, 1.36)] over 13 years in MESA. In a stratified meta-analysis of eight cohort studies (10 037 843 participants), the 2017 IDH definition was also not consistently associated with CVD and the relative magnitude of any potential association was noted to be numerically small [e.g. depending on inclusion criteria applied in the stratification, the adjusted hazard ratios ranged from 1.04 (95% CI 0.98, 1.10) to 1.09 (95% 1.03, 1.15)].

Conclusion: The lack of consistent excess in CAC or CVD suggests that emphasis on healthy lifestyle rather than drug therapy is sufficient among the millions of middle-aged or older adults who now meet the 2017 ACC/AHA criteria for IDH, though they require follow-up for incident systolic hypertension. These findings may not extrapolate to adults younger than 40 years, motivating further study in this age group.

Citing Articles

Association between cardiovascular risk and diastolic blood pressure in older adults with systolic blood pressure less than 130mmHg: a prospective cohort study from 2014 to 2022.

Hou J, Zhao S, Liu J, Xi X, Xu Y, Shi S Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024; 36(1):229.

PMID: 39623225 PMC: 11611959. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-024-02876-7.


[Elevated blood pressure and hypertension : Focus of the 2024 ESC guidelines on risk reduction].

Schmieder R, Schunkert H Herz. 2024; 50(1):17-24.

PMID: 39589443 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-024-05285-8.


Isolated diastolic hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes across different diagnostic guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Agarwal A, Mostafa M, Ahmad M, Soliman E Egypt Heart J. 2024; 76(1):127.

PMID: 39276199 PMC: 11401826. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00556-5.


Ambulatory isolated diastolic hypertension and risk of left ventricular hypertrophy in children with primary and secondary hypertension.

Myette R, Obrycki L, Litwin M, Seeman T, Sulakova T, Feber J Pediatr Nephrol. 2024; 39(12):3533-3541.

PMID: 39023539 PMC: 11511691. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-024-06457-8.


Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Treated Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Isolated Low Diastolic Blood Pressure.

Chang W, Chen Y, Lee Y, Shiu M, Chang P, Guo C J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(8):e032771.

PMID: 38606761 PMC: 11262516. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032771.


References
1.
Ni H, Wu C, Prineas R, Shea S, Liu K, Kronmal R . Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Am J Hypertens. 2006; 19(4):353-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.020. View

2.
Lee H, Yano Y, Cho S, Park S, Lloyd-Jones D, Kim H . Cardiovascular Risk of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension Defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline: A Nationwide Age-Stratified Cohort Study. Hypertension. 2020; 76(6):e44-e46. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16018. View

3.
McEvoy J, Daya N, Rahman F, Hoogeveen R, Blumenthal R, Shah A . Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes. JAMA. 2020; 323(4):329-338. PMC: 6990938. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.21402. View

4.
Benetos A, Thomas F, Bean K, Gautier S, Smulyan H, Guize L . Prognostic value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in treated hypertensive men. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(5):577-81. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.5.577. View

5.
Li Y, Wei F, Thijs L, Boggia J, Asayama K, Hansen T . Ambulatory hypertension subtypes and 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure as distinct outcome predictors in 8341 untreated people recruited from 12 populations. Circulation. 2014; 130(6):466-74. PMC: 4414316. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004876. View