» Articles » PMID: 33675641

Moving Toward the Promise of Participatory Engagement of Older Adults in Gerotechnology

Overview
Journal Gerontologist
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33675641
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limited uptake and use of developed technologies by older adults have prompted interest in participatory design and related approaches in the gerotechnology field. Despite this, recent systematic reviews suggest that researchers continue to passively engage older adults in research projects, often only providing advice or feedback in the early or later phases of research. A key barrier to more meaningful and active engagement of older adults is a lack of understanding as to how participatory design differs from other participatory approaches, and in particular, participatory action research. We address this gap in understanding by exploring the theoretical similarities and differences of participatory design and participatory action research, including their scope, goals, and the nature of the involvement of older adults in each. We conclude with key barriers that are critical to address in order to achieve greater involvement of older adults in gerotechnology and to broaden and enrich the goals of this field.

Citing Articles

Convergence of neurodegeneration and the arts: a conversation between researchers about stigma, co-creativity, and transformation.

Kuhlmann N, Kontos P, Christensen-Stryno M, Blain-Moraes S Res Involv Engagem. 2025; 11(1):22.

PMID: 40075542 PMC: 11898991. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-025-00696-1.


Motivation, barriers and preferences of lifestyle changes among older adults with frailty and mild cognitive impairments: A scoping review of qualitative analysis.

Mohammad Hanipah J, Mat Ludin A, Singh D, Subramaniam P, Shahar S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0314100.

PMID: 39832285 PMC: 11745415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314100.


"That's me at my best": perspectives of older adults on involvement in technology research.

Martin S, Zhang C, Tam M, Robillard J Med Humanit. 2024; 50(4):648-656.

PMID: 39719330 PMC: 11877045. DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013030.


Using Voice-Activated Technologies to Enhance Well-Being of Older Adults in Long-Term Care Homes.

Grigorovich A, Marcotte A, Colobong R, Szabo M, MacNeill C, Blais D Innov Aging. 2024; 8(12):igae102.

PMID: 39664605 PMC: 11630282. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igae102.


AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study on Prerequisites for Responsible Innovation.

Lukkien D, Stolwijk N, Ipakchian Askari S, Hofstede B, Nap H, Boon W JMIR Nurs. 2024; 7:e55962.

PMID: 39052315 PMC: 11310645. DOI: 10.2196/55962.


References
1.
Fischer B, Peine A, Ostlund B . The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design. Gerontologist. 2019; 60(7):e513-e523. PMC: 7491439. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz163. View

2.
Peine A, Neven L . From Intervention to Co-constitution: New Directions in Theorizing about Aging and Technology. Gerontologist. 2018; 59(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny050. View

3.
Grigorovich A, Kontos P . Towards Responsible Implementation of Monitoring Technologies in Institutional Care. Gerontologist. 2020; 60(7):1194-1201. PMC: 7491435. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz190. View

4.
Mannheim I, Schwartz E, Xi W, Buttigieg S, McDonnell-Naughton M, Wouters E . Inclusion of Older Adults in the Research and Design of Digital Technology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(19). PMC: 6801827. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193718. View

5.
Sumner J, Chong L, Bundele A, Lim Y . Co-Designing Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. Gerontologist. 2020; 61(7):e395-e409. PMC: 8437501. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa064. View