» Articles » PMID: 33673014

Personal Exposure Assessment to Wi-Fi Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Mexican Microenvironments

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33673014
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, personal exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) has substantially increased, and most studies about RF-EMF with volunteers have been developed in Europe. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study carried out in Mexico with personal exposimeters. The main objective was to measure personal exposure to RF-EMF from Wireless Fidelity or wireless Internet connection (Wi-Fi) frequency bands in Tamazunchale, San Luis Potosi, Mexico, to compare results with maximum levels permitted by international recommendations and to find if there are differences in the microenvironments subject to measurements. The study was conducted with 63 volunteers in different microenvironments: home, workplace, outside, schools, travel, and shopping. The mean minimum values registered were 146.5 μW/m in travel from the Wi-Fi 2G band and 116.8 μW/m at home from the Wi-Fi 5G band, and the maximum values registered were 499.7 μW/m and 264.9 μW/m at the workplace for the Wi-Fi 2G band and the Wi-Fi 5G band, respectively. In addition, by time period and type of day, minimum values were registered at nighttime, these values being 129.4 μW/m and 93.9 μW/m, and maximum values were registered in the daytime, these values being 303.1 μW/m and 168.3 μW/m for the Wi-Fi 2G and Wi-Fi 5G bands, respectively. In no case, values exceeded limits established by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Of the study participants ( = 63), a subgroup ( = 35) answered a survey on risk perception. According to these results, the Tamazunchale (Mexico) population is worried about this situation in comparison with several European cities; however, the risk perception changes when they are informed about the results for the study.

Citing Articles

Evaluating radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in confined spaces: a systematic review of recent studies and future directions.

Ahsan Ashraf M, Celik T Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2024; 200(6):598-616.

PMID: 38491820 PMC: 11033578. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncae045.


Effects of radiofrequency field from 5G communication on fecal microbiome and metabolome profiles in mice.

Wang X, Zhou G, Lin J, Qin T, Du J, Guo L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3571.

PMID: 38347014 PMC: 10861445. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53842-2.


Assessment of the electromagnetic field exposure due to wireless communication technologies in two university campuses of medellin, Colombia.

Suarez F, Yepes S, Escobar A Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e20323.

PMID: 37809888 PMC: 10560042. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20323.


Human Exposure to Non-Ionizing Radiation from Indoor Distributed Antenna System: Shopping Mall Measurement Analysis.

da L A Silva J, de Sousa Jr V, Rodrigues M, Pinheiro F, da Silva G, Mendonca H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(10).

PMID: 37430493 PMC: 10220726. DOI: 10.3390/s23104579.

References
1.
Roser K, Schoeni A, Struchen B, Zahner M, Eeftens M, Frohlich J . Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure measurements in Swiss adolescents. Environ Int. 2017; 99:303-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.008. View

2.
. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 1998; 74(4):494-522. View

3.
Markakis I, Samaras T . Radiofrequency exposure in Greek indoor environments. Health Phys. 2013; 104(3):293-301. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31827ca667. View

4.
Joseph W, Vermeeren G, Verloock L, Heredia M, Martens L . Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public. Health Phys. 2008; 95(3):317-30. DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000318880.16023.61. View

5.
Gonzalez-Rubio J, Najera A, Arribas E . Comprehensive personal RF-EMF exposure map and its potential use in epidemiological studies. Environ Res. 2016; 149:105-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.010. View