» Articles » PMID: 33671155

Calcium Phosphate Modified with Silicon Vs. Bovine Hydroxyapatite for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Densitometric Evaluation, Morphological Changes and Histomorphometric Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33671155
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After tooth extraction, the alveolar bone undergoes a physiological resorption that may compromise the future placement of the implant in its ideal position. This study evaluated bone density, morphological changes, and histomorphometric results undergone by alveolar bone after applying a new biomaterial composed of calcium phosphate modified with silicon (CAPO-Si) compared with hydroxyapatite of bovine origin (BHA). Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) was performed in 24 alveoli, divided into a test group filled with CAPO-Si and a control group filled with BHA. Three months later, the mineral bone density obtained by the biomaterials, horizontal and vertical bone loss, the degree of alveolar corticalization, and histomorphometric results were evaluated. Both biomaterials presented similar behavior in terms of densitometric results, vertical bone loss, and degree of alveolar corticalization. Alveoli treated with CAPO-Si showed less horizontal bone loss in comparison with alveoli treated with BHA (0.99 ± 0.2 mm vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 mm), with statistically significant difference ( = 0.017). Histomorphometric results showed greater bone neoformation in the test group than the control group (23 ± 15% vs. 11 ± 7%) ( = 0.039) and less residual biomaterial (5 ± 10% vs. 17 ± 13%) ( = 0.043) with statistically significant differences. In conclusion, the ARP technique obtains better results with CAPO-Si than with BHA.

Citing Articles

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration of the Posterior Mandible to Allow Implant Placement: 1-Year Prospective Study Results.

Lorenz J, Ghanaati S, Aleksic Z, Milinkovic I, Lazic Z, Magic M Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 36(1):100-116.

PMID: 39351703 PMC: 11701953. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14363.


Esthetically driven immediate provisionalization in the anterior zone: 5-year results from a prospective study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.

Weigl P, Trimpou G, Hess P, Kolinski M, Bellucci G, Trisciuoglio D Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(8):460.

PMID: 39083185 PMC: 11291535. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05832-x.


Osteogenic Effect of a Bioactive Calcium Alkali Phosphate Bone Substitute in Humans.

Knabe C, Adel-Khattab D, Rezk M, Cheng J, Berger G, Gildenhaar R Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38135999 PMC: 10741049. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121408.

References
1.
Lorenz J, Korzinskas T, Chia P, Maawi S, Eichler K, Sader R . Do Clinical and Radiological Assessments Contribute to the Understanding of Biomaterials? Results From a Prospective Randomized Sinus Augmentation Split-Mouth Trial. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 44(1):62-69. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00139. View

2.
Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo L, Needleman I, Donos N . Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 17(2):341-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5. View

3.
Del Canto-Diaz A, de Elio-Oliveros J, Del Canto-Diaz M, Alobera-Gracia M, Del Canto-Pingarron M, Martinez-Gonzalez J . Use of autologous tooth-derived graft material in the post-extraction dental socket. Pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018; 24(1):e53-e60. PMC: 6344012. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22536. View

4.
Alt V, Kogelmaier D, Lips K, Witt V, Pacholke S, Heiss C . Assessment of angiogenesis in osseointegration of a silica-collagen biomaterial using 3D-nano-CT. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7(10):3773-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.024. View

5.
De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, de Sanctis M . Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 26(1):50-68. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12288. View