» Articles » PMID: 33671147

Resistant Starch Type 2 from Wheat Reduces Postprandial Glycemic Response with Concurrent Alterations in Gut Microbiota Composition

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33671147
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The majority of research on the physiological effects of dietary resistant starch type 2 (RS2) has focused on sources derived from high-amylose maize. In this study, we conduct a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial investigating the effects of RS2 from wheat on glycemic response, an important indicator of metabolic health, and the gut microbiota. Overall, consumption of RS2-enriched wheat rolls for one week resulted in reduced postprandial glucose and insulin responses relative to conventional wheat when participants were provided with a standard breakfast meal containing the respective treatment rolls (RS2-enriched or conventional wheat). This was accompanied by an increase in the proportions of bacterial taxa and in the fecal contents, reflecting the composition in the distal intestine. Additionally, fasting breath hydrogen and methane were increased during RS2-enriched wheat consumption. However, although changes in fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were not significant between control and RS-enriched wheat roll consumption, butyrate and total SCFAs were positively correlated with relative abundance of , , , and . These effects show that RS2-enriched wheat consumption results in a reduction in postprandial glycemia, altered gut microbial composition, and increased fermentation activity relative to wild-type wheat.

Citing Articles

Hydrogen and Methane Detection in Breath in Response to Two Different Types of Dietary Fiber and Its Relationship to Postprandial Glucose Concentration in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Normoglycemic Subjects.

Misnikova I, Kovaleva Y, Shokur S, LeBaron T, Povarova O, Medvedev O Nutrients. 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40077785 PMC: 11902166. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050917.


Nutrition and Gut Health: Preparation and Efficacy of Resistant Starch.

Niu Y, Wang L, Gong H, Jia S, Guan Q, Li L Foods. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39942065 PMC: 11817130. DOI: 10.3390/foods14030471.


Beneficial effects of ε-polylysine on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and gut microbiota in broilers fed a lysine-deficient diet.

Huang W, Guo Y, Ge C, Lv Y, Zhan S, Shen X Poult Sci. 2025; 104(2):104774.

PMID: 39793239 PMC: 11761935. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104774.


Fecal deoxycholic acid associates with diet, intestinal microbes, and total bilirubin in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Chan C, Lemos M, Finnegan P, Gagnon W, Dean R, Yazdanafar M JHEP Rep. 2024; 6(12):101188.

PMID: 39624235 PMC: 11609371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101188.


Microbiota-Focused Dietary Approaches to Support Health: A Systematic Review.

Hindle V, Veasley N, Holscher H J Nutr. 2024; 155(2):381-401.

PMID: 39486521 PMC: 11867136. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.043.


References
1.
Lee Y, Erdogan A, Rao S . How to assess regional and whole gut transit time with wireless motility capsule. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 20(2):265-70. PMC: 4015195. DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2014.20.2.265. View

2.
Troke R, Tan T, Bloom S . The future role of gut hormones in the treatment of obesity. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2014; 5(1):4-14. PMC: 3871274. DOI: 10.1177/2040622313506730. View

3.
Venkataraman A, Sieber J, Schmidt A, Waldron C, Theis K, Schmidt T . Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch. Microbiome. 2016; 4(1):33. PMC: 4928258. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-016-0178-x. View

4.
Sajilata M, Singhal R, Kulkarni P . Resistant Starch-A Review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021; 5(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.x. View

5.
Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S . DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(7):581-3. PMC: 4927377. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. View