» Articles » PMID: 33670489

Diagnostic Errors Induced by a Wrong a Priori Diagnosis: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33670489
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preventive strategies against diagnostic errors require the knowledge of underlying mechanisms. We examined the effects of a wrong a priori diagnosis on diagnostic accuracy of a focussed assessment in an acute myocardial infarction scenario. One-hundred-and-fifty-six medical students (cohort 1) were randomized to three study arms differing in the a priori diagnosis revealed: no diagnosis (control group), myocardial infarction (correct diagnosis group), and pulmonary embolism (wrong diagnosis group). Forty-four physicians (cohort 2) were randomized to the control group and the wrong diagnosis group. Primary endpoint was the participants' final presumptive diagnosis. Among students, the correct diagnosis of an acute myocardial infarction was made by 48/52 (92%) in the control group, 49/52 (94%) in the correct diagnosis group, and 14/52 (27%) in the wrong diagnosis group ( < 0.001 vs. both other groups). Among physicians, the correct diagnosis was made by 20/21 (95%) in the control group and 15/23 (65%) in the wrong diagnosis group ( = 0.023). In the wrong diagnosis group, 31/52 (60%) students and 6/23 (19%) physicians indicated their initially given wrong a priori diagnosis pulmonary embolism as final diagnosis. A wrong a priori diagnosis significantly increases the likelihood of a diagnostic error during a subsequent patient encounter.

Citing Articles

Impact of disclosing a working diagnosis during simulated patient handoff presentation in the emergency department: correctness matters.

Amano M, Harada Y, Shimizu T Diagnosis (Berl). 2024; 12(1):61-67.

PMID: 39404256 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2024-0121.


Longitudinal Changes in Diagnostic Accuracy of a Differential Diagnosis List Developed by an AI-Based Symptom Checker: Retrospective Observational Study.

Harada Y, Sakamoto T, Sugimoto S, Shimizu T JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e53985.

PMID: 38758588 PMC: 11143391. DOI: 10.2196/53985.


Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners' referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study.

Staal J, Speelman M, Brand R, Alsma J, Zwaan L BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):256.

PMID: 35395938 PMC: 8991944. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7.


Incidence of Diagnostic Errors Among Unexpectedly Hospitalized Patients Using an Automated Medical History-Taking System With a Differential Diagnosis Generator: Retrospective Observational Study.

Kawamura R, Harada Y, Sugimoto S, Nagase Y, Katsukura S, Shimizu T JMIR Med Inform. 2022; 10(1):e35225.

PMID: 35084347 PMC: 8832260. DOI: 10.2196/35225.

References
1.
Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff C, Tobler P . Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16(1):138. PMC: 5093937. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1. View

2.
Newman-Toker D, Makary M . Measuring diagnostic errors in primary care: the first step on a path forward. Comment on "Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings". JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(6):425-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.225. View

3.
Saber Tehrani A, Lee H, Mathews S, Shore A, Makary M, Pronovost P . 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986-2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013; 22(8):672-80. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001550. View

4.
GRUVER R, FREIS E . A study of diagnostic errors. Ann Intern Med. 1957; 47(1):108-20. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-47-1-108. View

5.
Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, van der Wal G, Timmermans D . Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2011; 87(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823f71e6. View