» Articles » PMID: 33670213

Usefulness of Cone-Beam CT-Based Liver Perfusion Mapping for Evaluating the Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33670213
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based-liver-perfusion-mapping usefulness during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to access treatment response and predict outcomes. From October 2016 to September 2018, 42 patients with HCCs scheduled for conventional TACE were prospectively enrolled. Three reviewers evaluated the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CBCT and CBCT-based-liver-perfusion-mapping of each tumor. Parenchymal blood volume (PBV) was measured. The operator's judgment on the technical results was recorded. Response outcome was determined on follow-up CT or magnetic resonance imaging, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Diagnostic performance for detection of a viable tumor was evaluated using multiple logistic regression with C-statistics. CBCT-based-liver-perfusion-mapping and the maximum PBV of the tumor were significant in multiple logistic regression analysis of response ( < 0.0001, = 0.0448, respectively), with C-statistics of 0.9540 and 0.7484, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of operator's judgment was 79.66% (95%CI 69.39%-89.93%). Diagnostic performance of CBCT-based-liver-perfusion-mapping showed a high concordance in three reviewers. The mean PBV of tumor, maximum PBV of tumor, and mean PBV of liver significantly decreased after TACE (each < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis, the AUC for prediction of residual tumor by the maximum PBV of tumor after TACE was 0.7523, with 80.8% sensitivity and 60.6% specificity.

Citing Articles

Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures.

Floridi C, Cellina M, Irmici G, Bruno A, Rossini N, Borgheresi A J Clin Med. 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35887791 PMC: 9322069. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144028.


In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?.

Bucalau A, Tancredi I, Verset G Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(20).

PMID: 34680278 PMC: 8533902. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205129.

References
1.
Gaba R, Lewandowski R, Hickey R, Baerlocher M, Cohen E, Dariushnia S . Transcatheter Therapy for Hepatic Malignancy: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27(4):457-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.752. View

2.
Georgiades C, Geschwind J, Harrison N, Hines-Peralta A, Liapi E, Hong K . Lack of response after initial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: does it predict failure of subsequent treatment?. Radiology. 2012; 265(1):115-23. PMC: 4137783. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112264. View

3.
Niu K, Yang P, Wu Y, Struffert T, Doerfler A, Schafer S . C-Arm Conebeam CT Perfusion Imaging in the Angiographic Suite: A Comparison with Multidetector CT Perfusion Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37(7):1303-9. PMC: 4946984. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4691. View

4.
Kim B, Kim S, Kim K, Chung Y, Kim M, Park M . Complete response at first chemoembolization is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2015; 62(6):1304-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022. View

5.
Kim S, Kamaya A, Willmann J . CT perfusion of the liver: principles and applications in oncology. Radiology. 2014; 272(2):322-44. PMC: 4263626. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14130091. View