» Articles » PMID: 33669617

Worm-Based Microfluidic Biosensor for Real-Time Assessment of the Metastatic Status

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Mar 6
PMID 33669617
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metastasis is a complex process that affects patient treatment and survival. To routinely monitor cancer plasticity and guide treatment strategies, it is highly desired to provide information about metastatic status in real-time. Here, we proposed a worm-based (WB) microfluidic biosensor to rapidly monitor biochemical cues related to metastasis in a well-defined environment. Compared to conventional biomarker-based methods, the WB biosensor allowed high throughput screening under low cost, requiring only visual quantification of outputs; Methods: were placed in the WB biosensor and exposed to samples conditioned with cancer cell clusters. The chemotactic preference of these worms was observed under discontinuous imaging to minimize the impact on physiological activity; Results: A chemotaxis index (CI) was defined to standardize the quantitative assessment from the WB biosensor, where moderate (3.24-6.5) and high (>6.5) CI levels reflected increased metastasis risk and presence of metastasis, respectively. We demonstrated that the secreted metabolite glutamate was a chemorepellent, and larger clusters associated with increased metastatic potential also enhanced CI levels; Conclusions: Overall, this study provided a proof of concept for the WB biosensors in assessing metastasis status, with the potential to evaluate patient-derived cancer clusters for routine management.

Citing Articles

Emerging Molecular Technology in Cancer Testing.

Sundaresan S, Lavanya S, Manickam M EJIFCC. 2024; 35(3):142-153.

PMID: 39507577 PMC: 11536271.


Worm-Based Diagnosis Combining Microfluidics toward Early Cancer Screening.

Shi Y, Cui C, Chen S, Chen S, Wang Y, Xu Q Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38675295 PMC: 11052135. DOI: 10.3390/mi15040484.


Scalable Electrophysiology of Millimeter-Scale Animals with Electrode Devices.

Dong K, Liu W, Su Y, Lyu Y, Huang H, Zheng N BME Front. 2024; 4:0034.

PMID: 38435343 PMC: 10907027. DOI: 10.34133/bmef.0034.


Microfluidics for Profiling miRNA Biomarker Panels in AI-Assisted Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Muthamilselvan S, Ramasami Sundhar Baabu P, Palaniappan A Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 22:15330338231185284.

PMID: 37365928 PMC: 10331788. DOI: 10.1177/15330338231185284.


Oxidative stress induced by Etoposide anti-cancer chemotherapy drives the emergence of tumor-associated bacteria resistance to fluoroquinolones.

Wang S, Chan S, Deng Y, Khoo B, Chua S J Adv Res. 2023; 55:33-44.

PMID: 36822389 PMC: 10770098. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.02.011.


References
1.
Cristofanilli M, Budd G, Ellis M, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller M . Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(8):781-91. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040766. View

2.
Gonzales D, Badhiwala K, Vercosa D, Avants B, Liu Z, Zhong W . Scalable electrophysiology in intact small animals with nanoscale suspended electrode arrays. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017; 12(7):684-691. PMC: 5500410. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2017.55. View

3.
Chronis N, Zimmer M, Bargmann C . Microfluidics for in vivo imaging of neuronal and behavioral activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Methods. 2007; 4(9):727-31. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1075. View

4.
Ellis I, Galea M, Broughton N, Locker A, Blamey R, Elston C . Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1992; 20(6):479-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb01032.x. View

5.
Gauvain K, Garbow J, Song S, Hirbe A, Weilbaecher K . MRI detection of early bone metastases in b16 mouse melanoma models. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005; 22(5):403-11. PMC: 2726655. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-005-1264-9. View