» Articles » PMID: 33667670

Phase III, Randomized Trial of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer: Primary analysis of FORWARD I

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Mar 5
PMID 33667670
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent. The randomized, open-label, phase III study FORWARD I compared MIRV and investigator's choice chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Patients And Methods: Eligible patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy and whose tumors were positive for FRα expression were randomly assigned, in a 2 : 1 ratio, to receive MIRV (6 mg/kg, adjusted ideal body weight) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival [PFS, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, blinded independent central review] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the prespecified FRα high population.

Results: A total of 366 patients were randomized; 243 received MIRV and 109 received chemotherapy. The primary endpoint, PFS, did not reach statistical significance in either the ITT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98, P = 0.897] or the FRα high population (HR, 0.69, P = 0.049). Superior outcomes for MIRV over chemotherapy were observed in all secondary endpoints in the FRα high population including improved objective response rate (24% versus 10%), CA-125 responses (53% versus 25%), and patient-reported outcomes (27% versus 13%). Fewer treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (25.1% versus 44.0%), and fewer events leading to dose reduction (19.8% versus 30.3%) and treatment discontinuation (4.5% versus 8.3%) were seen with MIRV compared with chemotherapy.

Conclusions: In patients with platinum-resistant EOC, MIRV did not result in a significant improvement in PFS compared with chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints consistently favored MIRV, particularly in patients with high FRα expression. MIRV showed a differentiated and more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Folate receptor alpha for cancer therapy: an antibody and antibody-drug conjugate target coming of age.

Liu Y, Chen X, Evan T, Esapa B, Chenoweth A, Cheung A MAbs. 2025; 17(1):2470309.

PMID: 40045156 PMC: 11901361. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2470309.


Intraepithelial corneal deposits associated with Mirvetuximab soravtansine use for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

McRae C, Cowan R, Green M, Parker J Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2025; 38:102271.

PMID: 40028469 PMC: 11869836. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2025.102271.


Is ADC a rising star in solid tumor? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Wei H, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Zou Y, Zhou L, Qin X BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):380.

PMID: 40021960 PMC: 11871788. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13726-8.


Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Lenvatinib and Toripalimab in Patients With Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Study Protocol of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Clinical Trial.

Su H, Shang X, Liu H, Wang Y, Yu Y, Xu Y Int J Womens Health. 2025; 17:325-333.

PMID: 39931671 PMC: 11809359. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S502665.


Immunotherapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Chen K, Wang J, Yang M, Deng S, Sun L Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857752 PMC: 11762523. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010168.