» Articles » PMID: 33665333

Low Uptake of COVID-19 Prevention Behaviours and High Socioeconomic Impact of Lockdown Measures in South Asia: Evidence from a Large-scale Multi-country Surveillance Programme

Abstract

Background: South Asia has become a major epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding South Asians' awareness, attitudes and experiences of early measures for the prevention of COVID-19 is key to improving the effectiveness and mitigating the social and economic impacts of pandemic responses at a critical time for the Region.

Methods: We assessed the knowledge, behaviours, health and socio-economic circumstances of 29,809 adult men and women, at 93 locations across four South Asian countries. Data were collected during the national lockdowns implemented from March to July 2020, and compared with data collected prior to the pandemic as part of an ongoing prospective surveillance initiative.

Results: Participants were 61% female, mean age 45.1 years. Almost half had one or more chronic disease, including diabetes (16%), hypertension (23%) or obesity (16%). Knowledge of the primary COVID-19 symptoms and transmission routes was high, but access to hygiene and personal protection resources was low (running water 63%, hand sanitisers 53%, paper tissues 48%). Key preventive measures were not widely adopted. Knowledge, access to, and uptake of COVID-19 prevention measures were low amongst people from disadvantaged socio-economic groups. Fifteen percent of people receiving treatment for chronic diseases reported loss of access to long-term medications; 40% reported symptoms suggestive of anxiety or depression. The prevalence of unemployment rose from 9.3% to 39.4% (P < 0.001), and household income fell by 52% (P < 0.001) during the lockdown. Younger people and those from less affluent socio-economic groups were most severely impacted. Sedentary time increased by 32% and inadequate fruit and vegetable intake increased by 10% (P < 0.001 for both), while tobacco and alcohol consumption dropped by 41% and 80%, respectively (P < 0.001), during the lockdown.

Conclusions: Our results identified important knowledge, access and uptake barriers to the prevention of COVID-19 in South Asia, and demonstrated major adverse impacts of the pandemic on chronic disease treatment, mental health, health-related behaviours, employment and household finances. We found important sociodemographic differences for impact, suggesting a widening of existing inequalities. Our findings underscore the need for immediate large-scale action to close gaps in knowledge and access to essential resources for prevention, along with measures to safeguard economic production and mitigate socio-economic impacts on the young and the poor.

Citing Articles

Measuring the frequency and determinants of COVID-19 prevention behaviours: a cross-sectional assessment of large-scale programmes in seven countries, late 2020.

Bick S, White S, Hasund Thorseth A, Friedrich M, Gavin I, Gautam O BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e082419.

PMID: 39153783 PMC: 11331854. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082419.


A systematic review on the relationship between socioeconomic conditions and emotional disorder symptoms during Covid-19: unearthing the potential role of economic concerns and financial strain.

Chan J, Marzuki A, Vafa S, Thanaraju A, Yap J, Chan X BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):237.

PMID: 38671542 PMC: 11046828. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01715-8.


Fruit and vegetable consumption during the COVID-19 lockdown in Sri Lanka: an online survey.

Sooriyaarachchi P, Francis T, Jayawardena R Nutrire. 2024; 47(2):12.

PMID: 38625301 PMC: 9205284. DOI: 10.1186/s41110-022-00161-z.


Compliance with World Health Organization COVID-19 preventive behaviors in rural counties in Western Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Nyaranga C, Wilberforce C, Njororai F Pan Afr Med J. 2024; 47:30.

PMID: 38558548 PMC: 10979812. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.30.40558.


Families adapting to COVID-19 in urban Bangladesh: "It felt like the sky fell apart and we were in shock".

Nandonik A, Das Pooja S, Kabir Z, Kiriam S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1296083.

PMID: 38550643 PMC: 10977077. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296083.


References
1.
Jha S, Soni A, Siddiqui S, Batra N, Goel N, Dey S . Prevalence of Flu-like Symptoms and COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers from India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2020; 68(7):27-29. View

2.
Gambhir R, Dhaliwal J, Aggarwal A, Anand S, Anand V, Kaur Bhangu A . Covid-19: a survey on knowledge, awareness and hygiene practices among dental health professionals in an Indian scenario. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2020; 71(2):223-229. DOI: 10.32394/rpzh.2020.0115. View

3.
Alvi M, Gupta M . Learning in times of lockdown: how Covid-19 is affecting education and food security in India. Food Secur. 2020; 12(4):793-796. PMC: 7338145. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-020-01065-4. View

4.
Joshi R, Atal S, Fatima Z, Balakrishnan S, Sharma S, Joshi A . Diabetes care during COVID-19 lockdown at a tertiary care centre in India. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 166:108316. PMC: 7358163. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108316. View

5.
Abdul Khader M, Jabeen T, Namoju R . A cross sectional study reveals severe disruption in glycemic control in people with diabetes during and after lockdown in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020; 14(6):1579-1584. PMC: 7434486. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.011. View