» Articles » PMID: 3365915

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Imipramine and Desipramine in Alcoholics and Normal Volunteers

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1988 May 1
PMID 3365915
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently detoxified men with alcohol dependence (n = 15) and healthy volunteers (n = 14) were administered oral and intravenous imipramine and desipramine. Alcoholics had significantly greater total body clearance of imipramine (0.93 vs. 0.48 L/hr/kg; P less than 0.05) and desipramine (1.00 vs. 0.62 L/hr/kg; P less than 0.05) than did control subjects. Intrinsic clearance of unbound imipramine was greater in the alcoholic group (19.80 vs. 6.56 L/hr/kg; P less than 0.05), as was the intrinsic clearance of unbound desipramine (14.52 vs. 9.05 L/hr/kg; P less than 0.05). The mean elimination half-life for imipramine was significantly decreased in alcoholics (8.7 vs. 19.9 hours after intravenous infusion and 10.9 vs. 19.6 hours after oral administration; P less than 0.05). The mean elimination half-life for desipramine was decreased in alcoholics after intravenous infusion (16.5 vs. 22.4 hours; P less than 0.05). Unbound fractions of drug in plasma were decreased in the alcoholic group for both imipramine and desipramine after both routes of administration. alpha 1-Acid glycoprotein levels were elevated in the alcoholic group whereas total protein and albumin levels did not differ between groups. These findings suggest that recently detoxified alcoholics may require higher doses of imipramine than do nonalcoholic subjects. Desipramine clearance was affected to a lesser degree than imipramine, suggesting that from a pharmacokinetic standpoint it may be the preferred drug for the treatment of alcoholics with depression. Periodic monitoring of plasma levels may be required for recently abstinent alcoholics treated with antidepressants.

Citing Articles

Non-additivity of the functional properties of individual P450 species and its manifestation in the effects of alcohol consumption on the metabolism of ketamine and amitriptyline.

Ponraj K, Gaither K, Singh D, Davydova N, Zhao M, Luo S Biochem Pharmacol. 2024; 230(Pt 1):116569.

PMID: 39393643 PMC: 11609013. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116569.


Machine-Learning Assisted Screening of Correlated Covariates: Application to Clinical Data of Desipramine.

Asiimwe I, Ndzamba B, Mouksassi S, Pillai G, Lombard A, Lang J AAPS J. 2024; 26(4):63.

PMID: 38816519 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-00934-6.


Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Brain Delivery of Plasma Protein Bound Drugs.

Pardridge W Pharm Res. 2023; 40(3):661-674.

PMID: 36829100 PMC: 10036418. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-023-03484-2.


Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Nociceptive Pain Models Following an Oral Pregabalin Dose Administration to Healthy Subjects.

van Esdonk M, Lindeman I, Okkerse P, de Kam M, Groeneveld G, Stevens J CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2018; 7(9):573-580.

PMID: 30043517 PMC: 6157667. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12318.


Development and Qualification of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Drugs With Atypical Distribution Behavior: A Desipramine Case Study.

Samant T, Lukacova V, Schmidt S CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017; 6(5):315-321.

PMID: 28398693 PMC: 5697013. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12180.