Perceptions of SNAP and Stocking Standards: A Qualitative Study of California Small Food Store Owners and Managers

Overview

Journal Nutrients

Date 2021 Mar 3

PMID 33652765

Citations 1

Authors

Anthony Meza

June M Tester

Irene H Yen

Barbara A Laraia

Julia A Wolfson

Cindy W Leung

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is critical to alleviating food insecurity, but low diet quality among program participants is a concern. Nutrition-related interventions have focused on SNAP-authorized food retailers, but the perspectives of small food store owners and managers have not been represented in national policy discussions. This study aimed to explore the opinions of store owners/managers of SNAP-authorized small food stores about their overall perceptions of the program and the stricter stocking standards previously proposed in 2016. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 33 small food store owners and managers in San Francisco and Oakland, California in 2016. Interviews were analyzed for thematic content using the general inductive approach. Four themes emerged from owners/managers' discussion of their overall perceptions of SNAP: the beneficial impact of SNAP on their business, how SNAP enables them to connect with the broader community, the importance of SNAP in preventing hunger, and the nutrition-related struggles that SNAP participants face. Store owners/managers had a generally favorable response towards the proposed stricter stocking standards. Additional themes discussed pertained to the concern about whether stocking changes would lead SNAP participants to purchase more healthful food and some logistical challenges related to sourcing and storing perishable foods.

Citing Articles

Conducting industry informant interviews to advance healthy food retail initiatives: challenges, opportunities, and lessons.

Zhang A, Antonacci C, Laska M, Winkler M Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39569478 PMC: 11579594. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae158.

References

Powell L, Singleton C, Li Y, Anderson Steeves E, Castro I, Grigsby-Toussaint D . Changes to SNAP-authorized retailer stocking requirements and the supply of foods and beverages in low-income communities in seven U.S. states. Transl Behav Med. 2019; 9(5):857-864. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz093. View

Gittelsohn J, Laska M, Andreyeva T, Foster G, Rose D, Tester J . Small retailer perspectives of the 2009 Women, Infants and Children Program food package changes. Am J Health Behav. 2012; 36(5):655-65. PMC: 4703098. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.36.5.8. View

Karpyn A, DeWeese R, Pelletier J, Laska M, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Deahl-Greenlaw A . Examining the Feasibility of Healthy Minimum Stocking Standards for Small Food Stores. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118(9):1655-1663. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.12.006. View

Rose D, OMalley K, Futrell Dunaway L, Bodor J . The influence of the WIC food package changes on the retail food environment in New Orleans. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46(3 Suppl):S38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.008. View

Leung C, Ding E, Catalano P, Villamor E, Rimm E, Willett W . Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96(5):977-88. PMC: 3471209. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.040014. View

McDaniel P, Minkler M, Juachon L, Thayer R, Estrada J, Falbe J . Merchant Attitudes Toward a Healthy Food Retailer Incentive Program in a Low-Income San Francisco Neighborhood. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2018; 38(4):207-215. PMC: 6200316. DOI: 10.1177/0272684X18781788. View

Haynes-Maslow L, Andress L, Jilcott Pitts S, Osborne I, Baquero B, Bailey-Davis L . Arguments Used in Public Comments to Support or Oppose the US Department of Agriculture's Minimum Stocking Requirements: A Content Analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118(9):1664-1672. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.12.005. View

Nord M . How much does the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program alleviate food insecurity? Evidence from recent programme leavers. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 15(5):811-7. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002709. View

Steele-Adjognon M, Weatherspoon D . Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):946. PMC: 5727931. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z. View

10.

Shannon J . What does SNAP benefit usage tell us about food access in low-income neighborhoods?. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 107:89-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.021. View

11.

Andreyeva T, Tripp A, Schwartz M . Dietary Quality of Americans by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(4):594-604. PMC: 6022372. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.035. View

12.

Tester J, Leung C, Crawford P . Revised WIC Food Package and Children's Diet Quality. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(5). PMC: 4845874. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3557. View

13.

Whaley S, Ritchie L, Spector P, Gomez J . Revised WIC food package improves diets of WIC families. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44(3):204-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.09.011. View

14.

Cobb L, Anderson C, Appel L, Jones-Smith J, Bilal U, Gittelsohn J . Baltimore City Stores Increased The Availability Of Healthy Food After WIC Policy Change. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34(11):1849-57. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0632. View