» Articles » PMID: 33652156

A Phase 1-2 Study of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine in Combination With Nivolumab Plus or Minus Ipilimumab in Patients With Previously Treated Extensive-Stage SCLC

Abstract

Introduction: This open-label, phase 1-2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting DLL3, plus immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab in previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES SCLC).

Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, previously treated (two or more lines of therapy) ES SCLC were enrolled into two cohorts. Cohort 1 received 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T (once every 6 wk for two cycles) plus 360 mg nivolumab (two 3-wk cycles beginning on week 4). Cohort 2 received the same dosage of Rova-T as cohort 1 plus 1 mg/kg nivolumab (four 3-wk cycles) and 1 mg/kg ipilimumab (beginning week 4). Both cohorts received 480 mg nivolumab every 4 weeks starting at week 10. Key objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and efficacy (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1). The response-related results are based on centrally read data.

Results: A total of 42 patients received therapy: cohort 1, n = 30; cohort 2, n = 12. Overall, 43% received two or more previous lines of therapy. All patients experienced one or more treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 41 patients reported AEs considered related to the study drug by the investigator. The most frequent TEAE was pleural effusion (n = 20, 48%); most common grade greater than or equal to 3 was anemia (n = 9, 21%). Three grade 5 TEAEs considered related to the study drug were reported (cohort 1): pneumonitis (n = 2), acute kidney injury (n = 1). The objective response rate was 30% (12 of 40): cohort 1, 27.6% (8 of 29); cohort 2, 36.4% (4 of 11); all partial responses.

Conclusions: Despite encouraging antitumor activity in previously treated ES SCLC, combination therapy with Rova-T and nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab was not well tolerated at the dose levels and administration schedules evaluated.

Citing Articles

Advancement Opportunities and Endeavor of Innovative Targeted Therapies for Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Ouyang W, Xu Z, Guan S, Hu Y, Gou X, Liu Z Int J Biol Sci. 2025; 21(3):1322-1341.

PMID: 39897044 PMC: 11781172. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.105973.


Advances in DLL3-targeted therapies for small cell lung cancer: challenges, opportunities, and future directions.

Ding J, Yeong C Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1504139.

PMID: 39703856 PMC: 11655346. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1504139.


Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in human cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Jiang J, Han D, Wang J, Wen W, Zhang R, Qin W MedComm (2020). 2024; 5(10):e761.

PMID: 39372390 PMC: 11450264. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.761.


A simulated trial with reinforcement learning for the efficacy of Irinotecan and Ifosfamide versus Topotecan in relapsed, extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Bozcuk H, Artac M BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1207.

PMID: 39350046 PMC: 11440650. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12985-1.


Antibody-drug conjugates treatment of small cell lung cancer: advances in clinical research.

Meng Y, Wang X, Yang J, Zhu M, Yu M, Li L Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):327.

PMID: 39090431 PMC: 11294301. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01171-1.