» Articles » PMID: 33643346

Development and Validation of Methodology for Estimating Potato Canopy Structure for Field Crop Phenotyping and Improved Breeding

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Mar 1
PMID 33643346
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditional phenotyping techniques have long been a bottleneck in breeding programs and genotype- phenotype association studies in potato, as these methods are labor-intensive and time consuming. In addition, depending on the trait measured and metric adopted, they suffer from varying degrees of user bias and inaccuracy, and hence these challenges have effectively prevented the execution of large-scale population-based field studies. This is true not only for commercial traits (e.g., yield, tuber size, and shape), but also for traits strongly associated with plant performance (e.g., canopy development, canopy architecture, and growth rates). This study demonstrates how the use of point cloud data obtained from low-cost UAV imaging can be used to create 3D surface models of the plant canopy, from which detailed and accurate data on plant height and its distribution, canopy ground cover and canopy volume can be obtained over the growing season. Comparison of the canopy datasets at different temporal points enabled the identification of distinct patterns of canopy development, including different patterns of growth, plant lodging, maturity and senescence. Three varieties are presented as exemplars. Variety Nadine presented the growth pattern of an early maturing variety, showing rapid initial growth followed by rapid onset of senescence and plant death. Varieties Bonnie and Bounty presented the pattern of intermediate to late maturing varieties, with Bonnie also showing early canopy lodging. The methodological approach used in this study may alleviate one of the current bottlenecks in the study of plant development, paving the way for an expansion in the scale of future genotype-phenotype association studies.

Citing Articles

Seed tuber microbiome can predict growth potential of potato varieties.

Song Y, Atza E, Sanchez-Gil J, Akkermans D, de Jonge R, de Rooij P Nat Microbiol. 2024; 10(1):28-40.

PMID: 39730984 DOI: 10.1038/s41564-024-01872-x.


Temporally resolved growth patterns reveal novel information about the polygenic nature of complex quantitative traits.

Sweet D, Tirado S, Cooper J, Springer N, Hirsch C, Hirsch C Plant J. 2024; 120(5):1969-1986.

PMID: 39462452 PMC: 11629746. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.17092.


Phenotyping of Potato Plants Using Morphological and Physiological Tools.

Rozentsvet O, Bogdanova E, Nesterov V, Bakunov A, Milekhin A, Rubtsov S Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38475492 PMC: 10934635. DOI: 10.3390/plants13050647.


Revitalizing agriculture: next-generation genotyping and -omics technologies enabling molecular prediction of resilient traits in the Solanaceae family.

Martina M, de Rosa V, Magon G, Acquadro A, Barchi L, Barcaccia G Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1278760.

PMID: 38375087 PMC: 10875072. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1278760.


Study of High-Temperature-Induced Morphological and Physiological Changes in Potato Using Nondestructive Plant Phenotyping.

Lazarevic B, Carovic-Stanko K, Safner T, Poljak M Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36559644 PMC: 9783218. DOI: 10.3390/plants11243534.


References
1.
Sharma S, Mackenzie K, McLean K, Dale F, Daniels S, Bryan G . Linkage Disequilibrium and Evaluation of Genome-Wide Association Mapping Models in Tetraploid Potato. G3 (Bethesda). 2018; 8(10):3185-3202. PMC: 6169395. DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200377. View

2.
Burgess A, Retkute R, Herman T, Murchie E . Exploring Relationships between Canopy Architecture, Light Distribution, and Photosynthesis in Contrasting Rice Genotypes Using 3D Canopy Reconstruction. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:734. PMC: 5434157. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00734. View

3.
Li B, Xu X, Han J, Zhang L, Bian C, Jin L . The estimation of crop emergence in potatoes by UAV RGB imagery. Plant Methods. 2019; 15:15. PMC: 6371461. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0399-7. View

4.
Da Silva D, Han L, Faivre R, Costes E . Influence of the variation of geometrical and topological traits on light interception efficiency of apple trees: sensitivity analysis and metamodelling for ideotype definition. Ann Bot. 2014; 114(4):739-52. PMC: 4156120. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcu034. View

5.
Yang G, Liu J, Zhao C, Li Z, Huang Y, Yu H . Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing for Field-Based Crop Phenotyping: Current Status and Perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:1111. PMC: 5492853. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01111. View