» Articles » PMID: 33643256

The Type and Concentration of Inoculum and Substrate As Well As the Presence of Oxygen Impact the Water Kefir Fermentation Process

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Mar 1
PMID 33643256
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eleven series of water kefir fermentation processes differing in the presence of oxygen and the type and concentration of inoculum and substrate, were followed as a function of time to quantify the impact of these parameters on the kinetics of this process a modeling approach. Increasing concentrations of the water kefir grain inoculum increased the water kefir fermentation rate, so that the metabolic activity during water kefir fermentation was mainly associated with the grains. Water kefir liquor could also be used as an alternative means of inoculation, but the resulting fermentation process progressed slower than the one inoculated with water kefir grains, and the production of water kefir grain mass was absent. Substitution of sucrose with glucose and/or fructose reduced the water kefir grain growth, whereby glucose was fermented faster than fructose. (formerly known as ), (formerly known as ), (formerly known as ), , and were the main microorganisms present. Acetic acid bacteria were present in low abundances under anaerobic conditions and only proliferated under aerobic conditions. Visualization of the water kefir grains through scanning electron microscopy revealed that the majority of the microorganisms was attached onto their surface. Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts were predominantly associated with the grains, whereas acetic acid bacteria were predominantly associated with the liquor.

Citing Articles

Time of first contact determines cooperator success in a three-member microbial consortium.

Los R, Fecker T, van Touw P, van Tatenhove-Pel R, Idema T ISME Commun. 2025; 5(1):ycaf004.

PMID: 40041704 PMC: 11879117. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf004.


Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of water kefir produced from carob (.) sherbet.

Gulhan M, Gulhan A, Dusgun C Food Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 34(1):103-114.

PMID: 39758735 PMC: 11695531. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-024-01682-1.


Licuri Kernel (): A Promising Matrix for the Development of Fermented Plant-Based Kefir Beverages.

de Carvalho Alves J, Souza C, de Matos Santos L, Neris Almeida Viana S, Assis D, Tavares P Foods. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38998561 PMC: 11240999. DOI: 10.3390/foods13132056.


Microbial viability and nutritional content of water kefir grains under different storage conditions.

Gokirmakli C, Satir G, Guzel-Seydim Z Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(6):4143-4150.

PMID: 38873456 PMC: 11167166. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4074.


Physico-Chemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties of Water Kefir Drinks Produced from Demineralized Whey and Dimrit and Shiraz Grape Varieties.

Safak H, Gun I, Tudor Kalit M, Kalit S Foods. 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37174389 PMC: 10177904. DOI: 10.3390/foods12091851.


References
1.
Laureys D, Van Jean A, Dumont J, De Vuyst L . Investigation of the instability and low water kefir grain growth during an industrial water kefir fermentation process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017; 101(7):2811-2819. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-8084-5. View

2.
Bartowsky E, Xia D, Gibson R, Fleet G, Henschke P . Spoilage of bottled red wine by acetic acid bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003; 36(5):307-14. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01314.x. View

3.
Laureys D, Aerts M, Vandamme P, De Vuyst L . Oxygen and diverse nutrients influence the water kefir fermentation process. Food Microbiol. 2018; 73:351-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.02.007. View

4.
Hsieh H, Wang S, Chen T, Huang Y, Chen M . Effects of cow's and goat's milk as fermentation media on the microbial ecology of sugary kefir grains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012; 157(1):73-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.014. View

5.
Marsh A, OSullivan O, Hill C, Ross R, Cotter P . Sequence-based analysis of the microbial composition of water kefir from multiple sources. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013; 348(1):79-85. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6968.12248. View