» Articles » PMID: 33638241

QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: A Realistic in Silico Head Phantom for MRI Data Simulation and Evaluation of Susceptibility Mapping Procedures

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Feb 27
PMID 33638241
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To create a realistic in silico head phantom for the second QSM reconstruction challenge and for future evaluations of processing algorithms for QSM.

Methods: We created a digital whole-head tissue property phantom by segmenting and postprocessing high-resolution (0.64 mm isotropic), multiparametric MRI data acquired at 7 T from a healthy volunteer. We simulated the steady-state magnetization at 7 T using a Bloch simulator and mimicked a Cartesian sampling scheme through Fourier-based processing. Computer code for generating the phantom and performing the MR simulation was designed to facilitate flexible modifications of the phantom in the future, such as the inclusion of pathologies as well as the simulation of a wide range of acquisition protocols. Specifically, the following parameters and effects were implemented: TR and TE, voxel size, background fields, and RF phase biases. Diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data are provided, allowing future investigations of tissue-microstructure effects in phase and QSM algorithms.

Results: The brain part of the phantom featured realistic morphology with spatial variations in relaxation and susceptibility values similar to the in vivo setting. We demonstrated some of the phantom's properties, including the possibility of generating phase data with nonlinear evolution over TE due to partial-volume effects or complex distributions of frequency shifts within the voxel.

Conclusion: The presented phantom and computer programs are publicly available and may serve as a ground truth in future assessments of the faithfulness of quantitative susceptibility reconstruction algorithms.

Citing Articles

The Advanced BRain Imaging on ageing and Memory (ABRIM) data collection: Study design, data processing, and rationale.

Jansen M, Zwiers M, Marques J, Chan K, Amelink J, Altgassen M PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0306006.

PMID: 38905233 PMC: 11192316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306006.


Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group.

Bilgic B, Costagli M, Chan K, Duyn J, Langkammer C, Lee J Magn Reson Med. 2024; 91(5):1834-1862.

PMID: 38247051 PMC: 10950544. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30006.


Incomplete spectrum QSM using support information.

Fuchs P, Shmueli K Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1130524.

PMID: 37139523 PMC: 10149841. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1130524.


Evaluation of multi-channel phase reconstruction methods for quantitative susceptibility mapping on postmortem human brain.

Otsuka F, Garcia Otaduy M, Azevedo J, Chaim K, Salmon C J Magn Reson Open. 2023; 14-15.

PMID: 37006464 PMC: 10062192. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmro.2023.100097.


Toward a realistic in silico abdominal phantom for QSM.

Silva J, Milovic C, Lambert M, Montalba C, Arrieta C, Irarrazaval P Magn Reson Med. 2023; 89(6):2402-2418.

PMID: 36695213 PMC: 10952412. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29597.


References
1.
Li X, Harrison D, Liu H, Jones C, Oh J, Calabresi P . Magnetic susceptibility contrast variations in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 43(2):463-73. PMC: 4678033. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24976. View

2.
Zhou D, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang Y . Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem. NMR Biomed. 2014; 27(3):312-9. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3064. View

3.
Milovic C, Tejos C, Acosta-Cabronero J, Ozbay P, Schwesser F, Marques J . The 2016 QSM Challenge: Lessons learned and considerations for a future challenge design. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 84(3):1624-1637. PMC: 7526054. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28185. View

4.
Wharton S, Schafer A, Bowtell R . Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63(5):1292-304. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22334. View

5.
Mills P, Wu Y, Ho C, Ahrens E . Sensitive and automated detection of iron-oxide-labeled cells using phase image cross-correlation analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 26(5):618-28. PMC: 3200563. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.007. View