» Articles » PMID: 33638038

Development and Psychometric Validation of the BREAST-Q Animation Deformity Scale for Women Undergoing an Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Feb 27
PMID 33638038
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To assess the impact of animation deformity on health-related quality of life, a content-specific, valid, and reliable patient-reported outcome measure is needed. This report describes the development and validation of the BREAST-Q Animation Deformity scale.

Methods: Women with breast cancer who had an implant-based reconstruction provided data. In phase 1 (January 2017 and December 2018), qualitive and cognitive patient interviews and expert input were used to develop and refine scale content. In phase 2 (March to June 2019), a field test study with members of the Love Research Army (LRA) was conducted. Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine psychometric properties.

Results: In phase 1 of the study, qualitative (n = 11) and cognitive (n = 4) interview data and expert input (n = 9) led to the development of a 12-item scale measuring animation deformity. In phase 2, 651 LRA members provided data and 349 participated in a test-retest study. In the RMT analysis, the data fit the Rasch model (X(96) = 104.06; p = 0.27). The scale's reliability was high, with person separation index and Cronbach alpha values with/without extremes of ≥ 0.84 and ≥ 0.92 respectively, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.94). Mean scores on the Animation Deformity scale varied as predicted across subgroups of participants who reported differing amounts of change in breast appearance when their arms were lifted overhead or when they lifted something heavy, and for increasing happiness with the overall outcome of their breast reconstruction.

Conclusion: The 12-item Animation Deformity scale forms a new scale in the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module that can be used in comparative effectiveness research or to inform clinical care.

Citing Articles

Patient-reported outcomes 3 and 18 months after mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.

Harvey K, Johnson L, Sinai P, Mills N, White P, Holcombe C Br J Surg. 2025; 112(2).

PMID: 39996483 PMC: 11851068. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf032.


International study to develop a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate outcomes of gender-affirming care - the GENDER-Q.

Kaur M, Morrison S, Kennedy S, van de Grift T, Hojgaard A, Jacobsen A J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):134.

PMID: 39560846 PMC: 11576686. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00785-x.


Breast Augmentation Patient Satisfaction in an Appalachian Region.

Rahimpour A, Suite S, Dudich M, Denning D, Bown P, Ray P Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62550.

PMID: 39022505 PMC: 11254335. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62550.


Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

Rampal R, Jones S, Hartup S, Robertson C, Tahir W, Jones S Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 208(2):275-282.

PMID: 38985220 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07416-5.


Pectoral Muscle Re-Attachment with Breast Implant Removal.

Baxter R, Khan U Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 46(5):2614-2617.

PMID: 35859016 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03011-5.

References
1.
Spear S, Schwartz J, Dayan J, Clemens M . Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008; 33(1):44-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y. View

2.
Gruber R, Kahn R, Lash H, Maser M, Apfelberg D, Laub D . Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a comparison of submuscular and subcutaneous techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 67(3):312-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198103000-00007. View

3.
Vidya R, Tafazal H, Salem F, Iqbal F, Sircar T . Management based on grading of animation deformity following implant-based subpectoral breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2018; 45(2):185-190. PMC: 5869433. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01242. View

4.
Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E, Molinari P . A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005; 28(5):288-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0. View

5.
Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R . Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(3):432-443. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003627. View