The Neuroscience of Early Intervention: Moving Beyond Our Appeals to Fear
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract
This viewpoint is a continuation of the debate on the early intervention movement in psychiatry. The criticisms of Malhi and colleagues have generated some fundamental questions about the priorities of the early intervention movement and the need for further work. In particular, the summons sent to neuroscience need to be more specific in the near future. We may be doing well with what we have, but more directed efforts are needed to purposefully seek what we do not.
Citing Articles
Li M, Deng W, Li Y, Zhao L, Ma X, Yu H Psychol Med. 2022; 53(8):3500-3510.
PMID: 35164887 PMC: 10277763. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722000058.
References
1.
Malhi G, Bell E, Hamilton A, Morris G
. Early intervention: Lacks benefit because of lax definition?. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020; 54(11):1056-1058.
DOI: 10.1177/0004867420968145.
View
2.
Drake R, Husain N, Marshall M, Lewis S, Tomenson B, Chaudhry I
. Effect of delaying treatment of first-episode psychosis on symptoms and social outcomes: a longitudinal analysis and modelling study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(7):602-610.
PMC: 7606908.
DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30147-4.
View
3.
Palaniyappan L, Krishnadas R
. Treatment delay in early psychosis: not a linear problem. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(7):563-565.
DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30239-X.
View
4.
Woods S, Bearden C, Sabb F, Stone W, Torous J, Cornblatt B
. Counterpoint. Early intervention for psychosis risk syndromes: Minimizing risk and maximizing benefit. Schizophr Res. 2020; 227:10-17.
PMC: 8218020.
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.020.
View
5.
Palaniyappan L
. Progressive cortical reorganisation: A framework for investigating structural changes in schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017; 79:1-13.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.028.
View