» Articles » PMID: 33634849

Intrauterine Device Use and Risk of Ovarian Cancer: Results from the New England Case-Control Study and Nurses' Health Studies

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Feb 26
PMID 33634849
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Results of studies assessing intrauterine device (IUD) use and ovarian cancer risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between IUD use, including duration, type and timing of use, and ovarian cancer risk using three population-based studies. Data from the New England Case-Control Study (NEC) and two prospective cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS/NHSII), were included in the analysis. Information on IUD use was collected by in-person interview in NEC and by biennial questionnaire in NHS/NHSII. We used unconditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in NEC and Cox regression to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI in NHS/NHSII. We used meta-analysis to combine the NEC and the pooled NHS/NHSII results. Overall, IUD use was not associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.81-1.14 in NEC; HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.69-1.15 in NHS/NHSII; combined RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08). Among IUD users, older age at first use was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk (P-trend = .03). We did not observe significant associations by IUD type or duration of use. In conclusion, IUD use was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in our study.

Citing Articles

Incessant ovulation: a review of its importance in predicting cancer risk.

Cramer D Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1240309.

PMID: 37869082 PMC: 10588628. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1240309.


Reevaluating the Role of Progesterone in Ovarian Cancer: Is Progesterone Always Protective?.

Mauro L, Spartz A, Austin J, Lange C Endocr Rev. 2023; 44(6):1029-1046.

PMID: 37261958 PMC: 11048595. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnad018.


Beyond the pill: contraception and the prevention of hereditary ovarian cancer.

Xia Y, Kotsopoulos J Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022; 20(1):21.

PMID: 35668475 PMC: 9169328. DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00227-z.

References
1.
Modugno F, Goughnour S, Wallack D, Edwards R, Odunsi K, Kelley J . Breastfeeding factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 153(1):116-122. PMC: 6558958. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.017. View

2.
Ness R, Grisso J, Vergona R, Klapper J, Morgan M, WHEELER J . Oral contraceptives, other methods of contraception, and risk reduction for ovarian cancer. Epidemiology. 2001; 12(3):307-12. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00010. View

3.
MacIsaac L, Espey E . Intrauterine contraception: the pendulum swings back. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007; 34(1):91-111, ix. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.02.004. View

4.
Callahan R, Kopf G, Strauss 3rd J, Tworoger S . Tubal contraception and ovarian cancer risk: a global view. Contraception. 2016; 95(3):223-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.004. View

5.
Le D, Kubo T, Fujino Y, Sokal D, Vach T, Pham T . Reproductive factors in relation to ovarian cancer: a case-control study in Northern Vietnam. Contraception. 2012; 86(5):494-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.02.019. View