» Articles » PMID: 33634142

Knee Cartilage Thickness Differs Alongside Ages: A 3-T Magnetic Resonance Research Upon 2,481 Subjects Via Deep Learning

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Feb 26
PMID 33634142
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It was difficult to distinguish the cartilage thinning of an entire knee joint and to track the evolution of cartilage morphology alongside ages in the general population, which was of great significance for studying osteoarthritis until big imaging data and artificial intelligence are fused. The purposes of our study are (1) to explore the cartilage thickness in anatomical regions of the knee joint among a large collection of healthy knees, and (2) to investigate the relationship between the thinning pattern of the cartilages and the increasing ages. In this retrospective study, 2,481 healthy knees (subjects ranging from 15 to 64 years old, mean age: 35 ± 10 years) were recruited. With magnetic resonance images of knees acquired on a 3-T superconducting scanner, we automatically and precisely segmented the cartilage via deep learning and calculated the cartilage thickness in 14 anatomical regions. The thickness readings were compared using ANOVA by considering the factors of age, sex, and side. We further tracked the relationship between the thinning pattern of the cartilage thickness and the increasing ages by regression analysis. The cartilage thickness was always thicker in the femur than corresponding regions in the tibia ( < 0.05). Regression analysis suggested cartilage thinning alongside ages in all regions ( < 0.05) except for medial and lateral anterior tibia in both females and males ( > 0.05). The thinning speed of men was faster than women in medial anterior and lateral anterior femur, yet slower in the medial patella ( < 0.05). We established the calculation method of cartilage thickness using big data and deep learning. We demonstrated that cartilage thickness differed across individual regions in the knee joint. Cartilage thinning alongside ages was identified, and the thinning pattern was consistent in the tibia while inconsistent in patellar and femoral between sexes. These findings provide a potential reference to detect cartilage anomaly.

Citing Articles

Automated measurement and grading of knee cartilage thickness: a deep learning-based approach.

Guo J, Yan P, Qin Y, Liu M, Ma Y, Li J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1337993.

PMID: 38487024 PMC: 10939064. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1337993.


The Influence of Knee Position on Ultrasound Imaging of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Battersby H, Holmes S, Shumski E, Heredia C, Garcia S, Pamukoff D Cartilage. 2023; 15(2):84-93.

PMID: 37846037 PMC: 11368891. DOI: 10.1177/19476035231205682.


Knee instability caused by altered graft mechanical properties after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the early onset of osteoarthritis?.

Spierings J, Van den Hengel M, Janssen R, van Rietbergen B, Ito K, Foolen J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1244954.

PMID: 37691908 PMC: 10484411. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1244954.


Getting Cartilage Thickness Measurements Right: A Systematic Inter-Method Comparison Using MRI Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Nolte T, Westfechtel S, Schock J, Knobe M, Pastor T, Pfaehler E Cartilage. 2023; 14(1):26-38.

PMID: 36659857 PMC: 10076900. DOI: 10.1177/19476035221144744.


Intra-Articular Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence.

Wei P, Bao R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1).

PMID: 36613502 PMC: 9819973. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010059.


References
1.
Omoumi P, Michoux N, Roemer F, Thienpont E, Vande Berg B . Cartilage thickness at the posterior medial femoral condyle is increased in femorotibial knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional CT arthrography study (Part 2). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014; 23(2):224-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.08.017. View

2.
Englund M, Guermazi A, Gale D, Hunter D, Aliabadi P, Clancy M . Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(11):1108-15. PMC: 2897006. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800777. View

3.
Shah R, Martinez A, Pedoia V, Majumdar S, Vail T, Bini S . Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(10):2210-2215. PMC: 7251923. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.022. View

4.
Pitikakis M, Chincisan A, Magnenat-Thalmann N, Cesario L, Parascandolo P, Vosilla L . Automatic measurement and visualization of focal femoral cartilage thickness in stress-based regions of interest using three-dimensional knee models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 11(5):721-32. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1257-3. View

5.
Lories R, Luyten F . The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010; 7(1):43-9. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.197. View