» Articles » PMID: 33632732

Promoter Methylation Status in Initial and Recurrent Glioblastoma: Correlation Study with DWI and DSC PWI Features

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Feb 26
PMID 33632732
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: () promoter methylation status in primary and recurrent glioblastoma may change during treatment. The purpose of this study was to correlate promoter methylation status changes with DWI and DSC PWI features in patients with recurrent glioblastoma after standard treatment.

Materials And Methods: Between January 2008 and November 2016, forty patients with histologically confirmed recurrent glioblastoma were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the promoter methylation status for the initial and recurrent tumors: 2 groups whose promoter methylation status remained, group methylated ( = 13) or group unmethylated ( = 18), and 1 group whose promoter methylation status changed from methylated to unmethylated ( = 9). Normalized ADC and normalized relative CBV values were obtained from both the enhancing and nonenhancing regions, from which histogram parameters were calculated. The ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc tests were performed to compare histogram parameters among the 3 groups. The test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare parameters between group methylated and group methylated to unmethylated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to measure the predictive performance of the normalized relative CBV values between the 2 groups.

Results: Group methylated to unmethylated showed significantly higher means and 90th and 95th percentiles of the cumulative normalized relative CBV values of the nonenhancing region of the initial tumor than group methylated and group unmethylated (all < .05). The mean normalized relative CBV value of the nonenhancing region of the initial tumor was the best predictor of methylation status change ( < .001), with a sensitivity of 77.78% and specificity of 92.31% at a cutoff value of 2.594.

Conclusions: promoter methylation status might change in recurrent glioblastoma after standard treatment. The normalized relative CBV values of the nonenhancing region at the first preoperative MR imaging were higher in the promoter methylation change group from methylation to unmethylation in recurrent glioblastoma.

Citing Articles

Advanced Distance-Resolved Evaluation of the Perienhancing Tumor Areas with FLAIR Hyperintensity Indicates Different ADC Profiles by Promoter Methylation Status in Glioblastoma.

Bertalan G, Hainc N, Von Dehn F, Hortobagyi T, Bink A, Le Rhun E AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025; 46(2):302-310.

PMID: 39848779 PMC: 11878967. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8493.


Correlations of ‑methylguanine DNA methyltransferase () promoter methylation status with magnetic resonance imaging texture features and prognosis of glioblastomas.

Wang R, Sun Z, Sun J, Ma M, Wang H Mol Clin Oncol. 2024; 22(1):8.

PMID: 39583928 PMC: 11582520. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2024.2803.


Adaptive fine-tuning based transfer learning for the identification of MGMT promoter methylation status.

Schmitz E, Guo Y, Wang J Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024; 10(5).

PMID: 39029475 PMC: 11288403. DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad6573.


'The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated'-Evaluating the Effect of Necrosis on Promoter Methylation Testing in High-Grade Glioma.

Satgunaseelan L, Lee M, Iannuzzi S, Hallal S, Deang K, Stanceski K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38791984 PMC: 11120496. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101906.


Imaging biomarkers for clinical applications in neuro-oncology: current status and future perspectives.

Chiu F, Yen Y Biomark Res. 2023; 11(1):35.

PMID: 36991494 PMC: 10053808. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-023-00476-7.


References
1.
Romano A, Calabria L, Tavanti F, Minniti G, Rossi-Espagnet M, Coppola V . Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained by magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic marker in glioblastomas: correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status. Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(2):513-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2601-4. View

2.
Suh C, Kim H, Jung S, Choi C, Kim S . Clinically Relevant Imaging Features for Promoter Methylation in Multiple Glioblastoma Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(8):1439-1445. PMC: 7410549. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5711. View

3.
Han Y, Yan L, Wang X, Sun Y, Zhang X, Liu Z . Structural and advanced imaging in predicting MGMT promoter methylation of primary glioblastoma: a region of interest based analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):215. PMC: 5822523. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4114-2. View

4.
Feldheim J, Kessler A, Monoranu C, Ernestus R, Lohr M, Hagemann C . Changes of O-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) Promoter Methylation in Glioblastoma Relapse-A Meta-Analysis Type Literature Review. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(12). PMC: 6966671. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11121837. View

5.
Sunwoo L, Choi S, Park C, Kim J, Yi K, Lee W . Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values measured by diffusion MRI and MGMT promoter methylation semiquantitatively analyzed with MS-MLPA in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 37(2):351-8. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23838. View