» Articles » PMID: 33632131

The Effect of High-dose Intramuscular Epinephrine on the Recovery of Spontaneous Circulation in an Asphyxia-induced Cardiac Arrest Rat Model

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Feb 26
PMID 33632131
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Obtaining vascular access can be challenging during resuscitation following cardiac arrest, and it is particularly difficult and time-consuming in paediatric patients. We aimed to compare the efficacy of high-dose intramuscular (IM) versus intravascular (IV) epinephrine administration with regard to the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in an asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest rat model.

Methods: Forty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for these experiments. Cardiac arrest was induced by asphyxia, and defined as a decline in mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 20 mmHg. After asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest, the rats were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups (control saline group, IV epinephrine group, and IM epinephrine group). After 540 s of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and IV saline (0.01 cc/kg), IV (0.01 mg/kg, 1:100,000) epinephrine or IM (0.05 mg/kg, 1:100,000) epinephrine was administered. ROSC was defined as the achievement of an MAP above 40 mmHg for more than 1 minute. Rates of ROSC, haemodynamics, and arterial blood gas analysis were serially observed.

Results: The ROSC rate (61.5%) of the IM epinephrine group was less than that in the IV epinephrine group (100%) but was higher than that of the control saline group (15.4%) (log-rank test). There were no differences in MAP between the two groups, but HR in the IM epinephrine group (beta coefficient = 1.02) decreased to a lesser extent than that in the IV epinephrine group with time.

Conclusions: IM epinephrine induced better ROSC rates compared to the control saline group in asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest, but not compared to IV epinephrine. The IM route of epinephrine administration may be a promising option in an asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest.

Citing Articles

Sudden Cardiac Arrest in a Dental Patient Awaiting Examination.

Sumphaongern T, Yamahara E, Wakita R Anesth Prog. 2023; 70(1):25-30.

PMID: 36995959 PMC: 10069538. DOI: 10.2344/anpr-69-04-05.


Establishment of a nonshockable rhythm cardiac arrest model caused by asphyxia.

Zhang C, Zhan H, Zhou D, Li T, Zhang Q, Liu C BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):573.

PMID: 36581829 PMC: 9798662. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02996-w.

References
1.
OTTO C, Yakaitis R . The role of epinephrine in CPR: a reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med. 1984; 13(9 Pt 2):840-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80455-2. View

2.
Souchtchenko S, Benner J, Allen J, Brady W . A review of chest compression interruptions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and strategies for the future. J Emerg Med. 2013; 45(3):458-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.01.023. View

3.
Rittenberger J, Bost J, Menegazzi J . Time to give the first medication during resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006; 70(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.12.006. View

4.
Taylor C, Clarke N . Amputation and intraosseous access in infants. BMJ. 2011; 342:d2778. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d2778. View

5.
Vognsen M, Fabian-Jessing B, Secher N, Lofgren B, Dezfulian C, Andersen L . Contemporary animal models of cardiac arrest: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2017; 113:115-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.01.024. View