» Articles » PMID: 33628945

Biomechanical Evaluation of Self-cinching Stitch Techniques in Rotator Cuff Repair: The Single-loop and Double-loop Knot Stitches

Overview
Journal Open Med (Wars)
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Feb 25
PMID 33628945
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In rotator cuff repair, strong and reliable suturing is necessary to decrease failure rates. The biomechanics of two self-cinching stitches - the single-loop knot stitch (SLKS) and the double-loop knot stitch (DLKS) - and the modified Mason-Allen stitch (mMAS) were compared. Twenty-seven porcine infraspinatus tendons were randomized among the three stitches. Each was cyclically loaded (10-80-200 N for 50 cycles each) while the gap formation was measured. Next, ultimate load to failure was tested. The gap widths after cyclic loading were 8.72 ± 0.93 mm for the DLKS, 8.65 ± 1.33 mm for the mMAS, and 9.14 ± 0.89 mm for the SLKS, without significant differences. The DLKS showed the highest ultimate load (350.52 ± 38.54 N) compared with the mMAS (320.88 ± 53.29 N; = 0.304) and the SLKS (290.54 ± 60.51 N; < 0.05). The DLKS showed similar reliability and better strength compared with the mMAS, while the SLKS showed a slight but not significant decrease in performance. In our experience, the DLKS and SLKS have clinical advantages, as they are easy to perform and the self-cinching loop knot allows the surgeon to grasp degenerative tendon tissue. Initial intraoperative tightening of the suture complex (preloading) before locking is important in order to decrease postoperative elongation.

References
1.
Gerber C, Schneeberger A, Beck M, Schlegel U . Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(3):371-80. View

2.
Baums M, Buchhorn G, Spahn G, Poppendieck B, Schultz W, Klinger H . Biomechanical characteristics of single-row repair in comparison to double-row repair with consideration of the suture configuration and suture material. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(11):1052-60. PMC: 3085773. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0590-2. View

3.
Juul-Kristensen B, Bojsen-Moller F, Finsen L, Eriksson J, Johansson G, Stahlberg F . Muscle sizes and moment arms of rotator cuff muscles determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Cells Tissues Organs. 2000; 167(2-3):214-22. DOI: 10.1159/000016784. View

4.
Lorbach O, Tompkins M . Rotator cuff: biology and current arthroscopic techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(6):1003-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1901-1. View

5.
Chillemi C, Petrozza V, Garro L, Sardella B, Diotallevi R, Ferrara A . Rotator cuff re-tear or non-healing: histopathological aspects and predictive factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(9):1588-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1521-1. View