» Articles » PMID: 33627720

Machine Learning Approaches for the Prediction of Bone Mineral Density by Using Genomic and Phenotypic Data of 5130 Older Men

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Feb 25
PMID 33627720
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study aimed to utilize machine learning (ML) approaches and genomic data to develop a prediction model for bone mineral density (BMD) and identify the best modeling approach for BMD prediction. The genomic and phenotypic data of Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (n = 5130) was analyzed. Genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated from 1103 associated SNPs for each participant after a comprehensive genotype imputation. Data were normalized and divided into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%) for analysis. Random forest, gradient boosting, neural network, and linear regression were used to develop BMD prediction models separately. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for hyper-parameters optimization. Mean square error and mean absolute error were used to assess model performance. When using GRS and phenotypic covariates as the predictors, all ML models' performance and linear regression in BMD prediction were similar. However, when replacing GRS with the 1103 individual SNPs in the model, ML models performed significantly better than linear regression (with lasso regularization), and the gradient boosting model performed the best. Our study suggested that ML models, especially gradient boosting, can improve BMD prediction in genomic data.

Citing Articles

[Development of prognostic clinical and genetic models of the risk of low bone mineral density using neural network training].

Yalaev B, Novikov A, Minniakhmetov I, Khusainova R Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2025; 70(6):67-82.

PMID: 39868449 PMC: 11775677. DOI: 10.14341/probl13421.


A review of model evaluation metrics for machine learning in genetics and genomics.

Miller C, Portlock T, Nyaga D, OSullivan J Front Bioinform. 2024; 4:1457619.

PMID: 39318760 PMC: 11420621. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2024.1457619.


Establish and validate the reliability of predictive models in bone mineral density by deep learning as examination tool for women.

Hung W, Lin Y, Cheng T, Chin W, Tu L, Chen C Osteoporos Int. 2023; 35(1):129-141.

PMID: 37728768 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06913-5.


Risk factors associated with skeletal-related events following discontinuation of denosumab treatment among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors: A real-world machine learning approach.

Jacobson D, Cadieux B, Higano C, Henry D, Bachmann B, Rehn M J Bone Oncol. 2022; 34:100423.

PMID: 35378840 PMC: 8976128. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100423.


Large Scale Identification of Osteosarcoma Pathogenic Genes by Multiple Extreme Learning Machine.

Zhao Z, Shi J, Zhao G, Gao Y, Jiang Z, Yuan F Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:755511.

PMID: 34646831 PMC: 8502917. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.755511.


References
1.
Cosman F, de Beur S, LeBoff M, Lewiecki E, Tanner B, Randall S . Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(10):2359-81. PMC: 4176573. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. View

2.
Cordell H . Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(6):392-404. PMC: 2872761. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2579. View

3.
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis J . World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004148. View

4.
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H . Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996; 312(7041):1254-9. PMC: 2351094. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254. View

5.
Nelson M, Kardia S, Ferrell R, Sing C . A combinatorial partitioning method to identify multilocus genotypic partitions that predict quantitative trait variation. Genome Res. 2001; 11(3):458-70. PMC: 311041. DOI: 10.1101/gr.172901. View