» Articles » PMID: 33626583

Are We Ready for Video Recognition and Computer Vision in the Intensive Care Unit? A Survey

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2021 Feb 24
PMID 33626583
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Video recording and video recognition (VR) with computer vision have become widely used in many aspects of modern life. Hospitals have employed VR technology for security purposes, however, despite the growing number of studies showing the feasibility of VR software for physiologic monitoring or detection of patient movement, its use in the intensive care unit (ICU) in real-time is sparse and the perception of this novel technology is unknown. The objective of this study is to understand the attitudes of providers, patients, and patient's families toward using VR in the ICU.

Design: A 10-question survey instrument was used and distributed into two groups of participants: clinicians (MDs, advance practice providers, registered nurses), patients and families (adult patients and patients' relatives). Questions were specifically worded and section for free text-comments created to elicit respondents' thoughts and attitudes on potential issues and barriers toward implementation of VR in the ICU.

Setting: The survey was conducted at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota and Florida.

Results: A total of 233 clinicians' and 50 patients' surveys were collected. Both cohorts favored VR under specific circumstances (e.g., invasive intervention and diagnostic manipulation). Acceptable reasons for VR usage according to clinicians were anticipated positive impact on patient safety (70%), and diagnostic suggestions and decision support (51%). A minority of providers was concerned that artificial intelligence (AI) would replace their job (14%) or erode professional skills (28%). The potential use of VR in lawsuits (81% clinicians) and privacy breaches (59% patients) were major areas of concern. Further identified barriers were lack of trust for AI, deterioration of the patient-clinician rapport. Patients agreed with VR unless it does not reduce nursing care or record sensitive scenarios.

Conclusion: The survey provides valuable information on the acceptance of VR cameras in the critical care setting including an overview of real concerns and attitudes toward the use of VR technology in the ICU.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence in Nursing: Technological Benefits to Nurse's Mental Health and Patient Care Quality.

Dailah H, Koriri M, Sabei A, Kriry T, Zakri M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765983 PMC: 11675209. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242555.


Applied Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Review of Computer Vision Technology Application in Hospital Settings.

Lindroth H, Nalaie K, Raghu R, Ayala I, Busch C, Bhattacharyya A J Imaging. 2024; 10(4).

PMID: 38667979 PMC: 11050909. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10040081.


Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: A Scoping Review.

Moy S, Irannejad M, Manning S, Farahani M, Ahmed Y, Gao E J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024; 11(1):51-62.

PMID: 38596349 PMC: 11000703. DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.2029.

References
1.
Magnus M, Sikka N, Cherian T, Lew S . Satisfaction and Improvements in Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes Associated with Telehealth. Appl Clin Inform. 2017; 8(1):214-225. PMC: 5373765. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-RA-0154. View

2.
Liang Q, Xu L, Bao N, Qi L, Shi J, Yang Y . Research on Non-Contact Monitoring System for Human Physiological Signal and Body Movement. Biosensors (Basel). 2019; 9(2). PMC: 6627890. DOI: 10.3390/bios9020058. View

3.
Davoudi A, Malhotra K, Shickel B, Siegel S, Williams S, Ruppert M . Intelligent ICU for Autonomous Patient Monitoring Using Pervasive Sensing and Deep Learning. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):8020. PMC: 6541714. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44004-w. View

4.
Johnson K, Hagadorn J, Sink D . Alarm Safety and Alarm Fatigue. Clin Perinatol. 2017; 44(3):713-728. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.05.005. View

5.
McKenna H, Reiss I, Martin D . The significance of circadian rhythms and dysrhythmias in critical illness. J Intensive Care Soc. 2017; 18(2):121-129. PMC: 5606425. DOI: 10.1177/1751143717692603. View