» Articles » PMID: 33626147

ASAS-NANP Symposium: Digestion Kinetics in Pigs: the Next Step in Feed Evaluation and a Ready-to-use Modeling Exercise

Overview
Journal J Anim Sci
Date 2021 Feb 24
PMID 33626147
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Growing importance of upcycling agricultural by-products, food waste, and food processing by-products through livestock production strongly increased the variation in the nutritional quality of feed ingredients. Traditionally, feed ingredients are evaluated based on their measured extent of digestion. Awareness increases that in addition to the extent, the kinetics of digestion affects the metabolic fate of nutrients after absorption. Together with a growing body of evidence of complex interactions occurring within the lumen of the digestive tract, this urges the need of developing new approaches for feed evaluation. In a recently developed approach, we propose combining in vitro and in silico methods for feed ingredient evaluation. First steps in the development of such a systems were made by (1) evaluating in vitro the digestion potential of feed ingredients, regarding this as true ingredient properties and (2) predicting in silico the digestive processes like digesta transit, nutrient hydrolysis and absorption using dynamic, mechanistic modeling. This approach allows to evaluate to what extent the digestion potential of each ingredient is exploited in the digestive tract. Future efforts should focus on modeling digesta physicochemical properties and transit, applying in vitro digestion kinetic data of feed ingredients in mechanistic models, and generating reliable in vivo data on nutrient absorption kinetics across feed ingredients. The dynamic modeling approach is illustrated by a description of a modeling exercise that can be used for teaching purposes in digestive physiology or animal nutrition courses. A complete set of equations is provided as an on-line supplement, and can be built in modeling software that is freely available. Alternatively, the model can be constructed using any modeling software that enables the use of numerical integration methods.

Citing Articles

Relationship between dietary fiber physicochemical properties and feedstuff fermentation characteristics and their effects on nutrient utilization, energy metabolism, and gut microbiota in growing pigs.

Yong F, Liu B, Li H, Hao H, Fan Y, Datsomor O J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 16(1):1.

PMID: 39748438 PMC: 11697959. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01129-x.


Effects of the kinetic pattern of dietary glucose release on nitrogen utilization, the portal amino acid profile, and nutrient transporter expression in intestinal enterocytes in piglets.

Li Z, Li Y, Zhao Y, Wang G, Liu R, Li Y J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024; 15(1):49.

PMID: 38500230 PMC: 10946174. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01000-z.


ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Training the Future Generation in Data and Predictive Analytics for Sustainable Development. A Summary of the 2021 and 2022 Symposia.

Tedeschi L, Menendez 3rd H, Remus A J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37997923 PMC: 10664387. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad318.


Insoluble fibers affect digesta transit behavior in the upper gastrointestinal tract of growing pigs, regardless of particle size.

Dorado-Montenegro S, Lammers-Jannink K, Gerrits W, de Vries S J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37665959 PMC: 10651184. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad299.


Effect of Fiber Fermentation and Protein Digestion Kinetics on Mineral Digestion in Pigs.

Heyer C, Jaworski N, Page G, Zijlstra R Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(16).

PMID: 36009643 PMC: 9404855. DOI: 10.3390/ani12162053.


References
1.
Bastianelli D, Sauvant D, RERAT A . Mathematical modeling of digestion and nutrient absorption in pigs. J Anim Sci. 1996; 74(8):1873-87. DOI: 10.2527/1996.7481873x. View

2.
Chen H, Wierenga P, Hendriks W, Jansman A . In vitro protein digestion kinetics of protein sources for pigs. Animal. 2018; 13(6):1154-1164. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118002811. View

3.
Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Mills J, Pellikaan W, Lopez S, Bannink A . Predicting the profile of nutrients available for absorption: from nutrient requirement to animal response and environmental impact. Animal. 2012; 1(1):99-111. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107657760. View

4.
Gilbert M, Ijssennagger N, Kies A, van Mil S . Protein fermentation in the gut; implications for intestinal dysfunction in humans, pigs, and poultry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018; 315(2):G159-G170. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00319.2017. View

5.
Bastianelli D, Bonnal L, Jaguelin-Peyraud Y, Noblet J . Predicting feed digestibility from NIRS analysis of pig faeces. Animal. 2014; 9(5):781-6. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114003097. View