» Articles » PMID: 33625463

Association of SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive Antibody Test With Risk of Future Infection

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the effect of serum antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on susceptibility to infection is important for identifying at-risk populations and could have implications for vaccine deployment.

Objective: The study purpose was to evaluate evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on diagnostic nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among patients with positive vs negative test results for antibodies in an observational descriptive cohort study of clinical laboratory and linked claims data.

Design, Setting, And Participants: The study created cohorts from a deidentified data set composed of commercial laboratory tests, medical and pharmacy claims, electronic health records, and hospital chargemaster data. Patients were categorized as antibody-positive or antibody-negative according to their first SARS-CoV-2 antibody test in the database.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Primary end points were post-index diagnostic NAAT results, with infection defined as a positive diagnostic test post-index, measured in 30-day intervals (0-30, 31-60, 61-90, >90 days). Additional measures included demographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics at the time of the index antibody test, including recorded signs and symptoms or prior evidence of coronavirus 2019 (COVID) diagnoses or positive NAAT results and recorded comorbidities.

Results: The cohort included 3 257 478 unique patients with an index antibody test; 56% were female with a median (SD) age of 48 (20) years. Of these, 2 876 773 (88.3%) had a negative index antibody result, and 378 606 (11.6%) had a positive index antibody result. Patients with a negative antibody test result were older than those with a positive result (mean age 48 vs 44 years). Of index-positive patients, 18.4% converted to seronegative over the follow-up period. During the follow-up periods, the ratio (95% CI) of positive NAAT results among individuals who had a positive antibody test at index vs those with a negative antibody test at index was 2.85 (95% CI, 2.73-2.97) at 0 to 30 days, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.6-0.74) at 31 to 60 days, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.35) at 61 to 90 days, and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.19) at more than 90 days.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with positive antibody test results were initially more likely to have positive NAAT results, consistent with prolonged RNA shedding, but became markedly less likely to have positive NAAT results over time, suggesting that seropositivity is associated with protection from infection. The duration of protection is unknown, and protection may wane over time.

Citing Articles

A dynamic journey of comprehensive school health policy implementation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Lombok, Indonesia.

Warnaini C, Haq A, Kadriyan H, Shibuya F, Kobayashi J Trop Med Health. 2025; 53(1):25.

PMID: 39980001 PMC: 11841219. DOI: 10.1186/s41182-025-00690-z.


COVID-19 Vaccines Effectiveness and Safety in Trinidad and Tobago: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Justiz-Vaillant A, Roopnarine K, Solomon S, Phillips A, Sandy S, Subero A Microorganisms. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39858903 PMC: 11767614. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13010135.


Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Real World Data Infrastructure: A Big-Data Resource for Study of the Impact of COVID-19 in Patient Populations With Immunocompromising Conditions.

Crawford J, Penberthy L, Pinto L, Althoff K, Assimon M, Cohen O Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025; 12(1):ofaf021.

PMID: 39850579 PMC: 11756308. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf021.


PostCOVID-19 Impact on Perinatal Outcomes.

Kurmanova G, Ayazbekov A, Kurmanova A, Rakhimbayeva M, Trimova G, Kulembayeva A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795585 PMC: 11719491. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010057.


SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity in Nursing Home Staff and Residents during the First SARS-CoV-2 Wave in Flanders, Belgium.

De Rop L, Vercruysse H, Alenus U, Brusselmans J, Callens S, Claeys M Viruses. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39339937 PMC: 11437469. DOI: 10.3390/v16091461.


References
1.
Gudbjartsson D, Norddahl G, Melsted P, Gunnarsdottir K, Holm H, Eythorsson E . Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(18):1724-1734. PMC: 7494247. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026116. View

2.
Addetia A, Crawford K, Dingens A, Zhu H, Roychoudhury P, Huang M . Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 58(11). PMC: 7587101. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02107-20. View

3.
Li T, Cao Z, Chen Y, Cai M, Zhang L, Xu H . Duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and factors associated with prolonged viral shedding in patients with COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020; 93(1):506-512. PMC: 7362127. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26280. View

4.
. Performance characteristics of five immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2: a head-to-head benchmark comparison. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(12):1390-1400. PMC: 7511171. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30634-4. View

5.
Iwasaki A . What reinfections mean for COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 21(1):3-5. PMC: 7550040. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30783-0. View